Compare ยท GE Centricity PACS
GE Healthcare Centricity PACS Alternatives and What a GE PACS System Costs
The short answer
GE Healthcare Centricity PACS is the legacy GE radiology PACS, alongside PACS-IW and Universal Viewer. GE now also sells True PACS and, since March 2026, owns Intelerad. FDA lists 55 recall events for these products since 2007, and federal GE PACS awards have a $44,312 median. The alternatives are a new PACS, or keeping Centricity and adding AI to the read.
Search for GE PACS and almost every result is GE HealthCare selling its own next product. There is no independent comparison, and the buyer usually arrives with a renewal notice or a True PACS proposal on the desk. This page is for a hospital or health system imaging IT lead running Centricity PACS, PACS-IW or Universal Viewer who has to decide whether to stay with GE, move to another PACS, or keep the PACS and fix the read. Every figure comes from a public record we can point to.
Worklist
Structured report
DraftRun the assistant to draft this report for review.
Decision support. The radiologist reviews and signs every study.
Decision support for qualified clinicians. Radiological.ai does not provide a diagnosis and is not a substitute for professional judgment.
Flag · prioritize · draft · you review and sign
GE HealthCare sells the imaging platform: Centricity PACS, PACS-IW, Universal Viewer, True PACS, Enterprise Archive, AI orchestration and now Intelerad. Radiological.ai sells none of that. It is an assistant that works alongside the PACS you already run, flags suspected findings as studies arrive, reorders the worklist and drafts the structured report for the radiologist to sign. You would replace Centricity with another PACS. You would add us to Centricity.
Side by side
GE Centricity PACS against the PACS on a hospital shortlist
The choices a Centricity site is usually weighing at renewal. Every row is a published fact or a public record, not a benchmark we ran.
| What to compare | GE Centricity PACS and True PACS | Other PACS (Sectra, Fujifilm Synapse, Visage, Intelerad) |
|---|---|---|
| Who owns it | GE HealthCare (Nasdaq GEHC since January 4, 2023, Chicago). PACS-IW came from Dynamic Imaging, bought October 2007. | Sectra (Sweden, listed), Fujifilm (Japan), Visage (Pro Medicus, Australia). Intelerad has been part of GE HealthCare since March 18, 2026. |
| Product lines | Centricity PACS, Centricity PACS-IW, Universal Viewer with a zero footprint client, and True PACS (launched August 2021) built on Universal Viewer and Enterprise Archive. | Each sells one main PACS line. Intelerad sells IntelePACS, InteleOne and Ambra. |
| Cloud option | True PACS SaaS listed on AWS Marketplace September 23, 2025, US only. | Sectra One Cloud, Fujifilm Synapse on AWS, Visage 7 hosted, Intelerad cloud. |
| Newest FDA 510(k) for the viewer | K211312 Universal Viewer, May 21, 2021. 16 radiology PACS and viewer clearances since 2002. No 510(k) under the True PACS name. | Fujifilm K261713 Synapse PACS 7.6.0 (June 2026). Intelerad latest K192176 (2020). |
| FDA recalls | 55 recall events since 2007 across Centricity PACS, PACS-IW and Universal Viewer, all Class II where classified, 31 product entries still open. | Intelerad 4 open (September 2026). Check each vendor in the openFDA recall database. |
| Independent record | KLAS PACS 2023: high replacement rate, users call Centricity aging. KLAS 2025: negative momentum. | Sectra has been Best in KLAS for US PACS for 13 years. |
| Where it wins | One vendor for scanners, PACS, archive and AI orchestration, and an install base GE still supports. | Sectra on user satisfaction, Visage on speed for large health systems, Fujifilm on breadth. |
| Switching cost | Staying avoids a migration, but a move to True PACS is still a project. | High. Priors migration, interfaces and training. Budget it as its own line. |
GE facts come from gehealthcare.com, GE HealthCare press releases and SEC filings, AuntMinnie and the public KLAS report summaries, collected October 1, 2026. FDA data is from the openFDA 510(k) and recall databases. Federal award data is from USAspending.gov, award types A to D, fiscal 2008 to 2026, every recipient name and description read by hand.
What the public record shows
What federal buyers paid GE for PACS
GE publishes no PACS price, so we read every federal award that names GE PACS or Centricity. These are support, maintenance and license lines, the part of a GE quote that renews every year.
| Group of awards | Count and value | What it tells a buyer |
|---|---|---|
| GE PACS awards | 43 awards, $4,584,359 | The cleanest set: a GE recipient and a description that names PACS. |
| Typical award | Median $44,312 | Quartiles $7,500 and $124,135. Most lines are annual software maintenance or support. |
| Largest award | $1,259,247 (VA, July 2020) | Maintenance and repair services for GE PACS equipment. The next largest is $459,383 for Centricity PACS software maintenance (VA, October 2013). |
| By agency | VA 25 awards $3.90M, IHS 13 $533K | NIH 2 awards $144K, Navy 3 $12K. The VA carries most of the GE PACS spend. |
| A documented move away | $12,012 (IHS, March 2015) | A third party paid to migrate the Kayenta Health Center off GE Centricity PACS. Migration is a separate line, often a separate vendor. |
Source: USAspending.gov prime awards to GE recipients whose description names PACS or Centricity PACS, award types A to D, fiscal 2008 to 2026, pulled October 1, 2026. 116 rows read by hand. Excluded: 17 rows for Centricity Technology Partners (a different company), dental Universal Viewer products, GE cardiology and perinatal systems, and 10 VA data migration rows paid to unrelated firms.
Side by side
Radiological.ai vs GE Centricity PACS, honestly
A fair look at what each does well. Both are capable tools. Here is where they differ.
| What matters | Radiological.ai | GE Centricity PACS |
|---|---|---|
| What you are buying | Software that flags suspected findings on the image, prioritizes the worklist and drafts the structured report. | The PACS: Centricity PACS, PACS-IW or True PACS, with Universal Viewer, Enterprise Archive and AI orchestration. |
| Relationship to your PACS | Works alongside it. It reads from the PACS you already run, Centricity included. | It is the PACS. A move to True PACS or another vendor replaces what you have. |
| Unit of cost | Per reading radiologist, published: $399 a month on the Practice plan or $199 a month billed annually, and $598 a month on the Group plan or $299 a month billed annually. | Unpublished. Quote based. Federal GE PACS support awards have a $44,312 median. |
| Project size | Days to weeks. No image migration. | Months. Priors migration, interfaces, archive and training. |
| Who signs the report | The radiologist. The assistant never signs anything. | The radiologist, in whichever reporting system you run with the PACS. |
| Best suited for | Centricity sites whose radiologists need more studies read per hour before the PACS decision is made. | Health systems that want scanners, PACS, archive and AI orchestration from one vendor. |
Comparison reflects general, publicly understood positioning. Capabilities change, so check each product for the latest.
This page covers one PACS vendor. For the category, PACS software separates the deployment models, and PACS pricing and cloud PACS cost benchmarks quotes against federal PACS awards and lists the line items every quote bundles. If the Centricity RIS is up for renewal at the same time, radiology information system software compares RIS vendors for hospitals and imaging centers.
If a hospital PACS is on your shortlist, Sectra PACS alternatives, Fujifilm Synapse PACS alternatives and Visage PACS alternatives work through those quotes the same way, and Intelerad PACS alternatives covers the other PACS GE now owns. If you also run Philips or Carestream, Vue PACS alternatives covers that renewal, and Agfa PACS system alternatives covers IMPAX and Enterprise Imaging. McKesson Radiology and Change Healthcare sites have McKesson PACS system alternatives, and Philips iSite sites have IntelliSpace PACS alternatives. For enterprise scope, see enterprise imaging software.
If the PACS is fine for now and the real ask is AI, how the assistant integrates with your PACS explains what connects to what, radiology worklist prioritization covers the triage side, and our pricing is published per radiologist.
Why groups pick Radiological.ai
One assistant across the whole read
Ask GE which PACS it will invest in
GE now owns Centricity, True PACS and Intelerad. Ask in writing which line gets new features through the end of your next term, and whether a move from Centricity to True PACS is priced as an upgrade credit or a new contract.
Read the open recalls first
openFDA lists 31 Centricity PACS, PACS-IW and Universal Viewer recall entries still open, including a July 2026 recall where migrated historical data from Centricity PACS V2 to V7 was linked to the wrong record. Ask which ones apply to your version and when the fix lands.
Price migration as its own line
Federal records show PACS migration paid to third parties, separate from the PACS license. Whether you stay with GE or leave, get the export format, timeline and price into the contract while you still have leverage.
Separate the PACS decision from the AI decision
If your radiologists are short on time today, you do not have to wait for a PACS replacement. An assistant that reads from Centricity flags suspected findings and drafts the report now. Every flag is a prompt to look again and the radiologist signs every report.
Good questions
GE Centricity PACS vs Radiological.ai, answered
More comparisons
See how Radiological.ai compares
Aidoc alternative
One assistant across the whole read, not acute triage alone.
vs Rad AIRad AI alternative
Drafting plus flagging and triage, in one assistant.
vs DeepHealthDeepHealth alternative
Reporting AI without buying it from a competitor.
vs Fluency for ImagingPowerScribe vs Fluency for Imaging
The two reporting platforms most US groups actually shortlist.
vs Annalise.aiAnnalise.ai alternative
Finding flags plus triage and drafting, together.
vs Nuance PowerScribeNuance PowerScribe alternative
More than dictation: flagging, triage and drafting.
vs Qure.aiQure.ai alternative
Flags plus triage and drafting, in one assistant.
vs Viz.aiViz.ai alternative
Beyond acute stroke triage, across the whole read.
vs Nuance DAXNuance DAX alternative
Built for the read, not for the patient conversation.
vs LunitLunit alternative
One assistant across the whole read, not detection on two modalities.
vs GleamerGleamer alternative
One assistant across X-ray, CT and MRI, not a suite of per-exam detectors.
vs PowerScribe OnePowerScribe One vs 360
What actually changes in the cloud move, and the third option.
vs Sirona MedicalSirona Medical alternative
Add the assistant to the PACS you already run, without replacing the stack.
vs New LanternNew Lantern alternative
AI drafting and triage on the PACS you keep, not a new platform.
vs RapidAIRapidAI alternative
Past the stroke pathway, across the whole reading list.
vs Dragon Medical OneDragon Medical One pricing
Microsoft publishes no price. Here are 25 real federal contracts that do.
vs PowerScribePowerScribe pricing
No list price exists. Here are the only verifiable numbers that do.
vs PowerScribePowerScribe templates
What AutoText actually is, how to get yours out, and what survives a migration.
vs RADPAIR and PowerScribeRadPair vs PowerScribe
Three ways to write the report, compared on what each one actually replaces.
vs Aidoc and Viz.aiAidoc vs Viz.ai
Three acute triage platforms, compared on what they were each built to do.
vs vRad (Virtual Radiologic)vRad alternative
vRad publishes no rate card. 357 federal contract awards do.
vs ONRADONRAD alternative
ONRAD publishes no rate card. 80 federal contract awards do.
vs Real RadiologyReal Radiology alternative
Real Radiology publishes no rate card. 41 Army and VA contract awards do.
vs Experity TeleradiologyExperity Teleradiology alternative
The urgent care reading service that started as one Scottsdale radiologist and now sits inside an EMR company.
vs Sectra PACSSectra PACS alternative
The PACS that keeps winning satisfaction surveys, sold as a cloud subscription with no public price.
vs Visage PACSVisage PACS alternative
The fastest-growing enterprise viewer in US radiology, priced per transaction and disclosed deal by deal.
vs Intelerad PACSIntelerad PACS alternative
The teleradiology favorite, now a GE HealthCare business, with a renewal conversation that just changed.
vs Exa PACSExa PACS alternative
Often sold alongside a Konica X-ray room, with a thin public record you should fill in before you sign.
vs Agfa PACSAgfa PACS alternative
A Best in KLAS platform, a federal record over $300 million, and an IMPAX install base being moved to the cloud.
vs McKesson PACSMcKesson PACS alternative
A Horizon Medical Imaging install base now owned by Optum, a $98 million federal record and a cloud PACS sold per study.
vs Mach7Mach7 alternative
A Vermont-run, ASX-listed enterprise imaging vendor with a new CEO, falling revenue and a seat on the VA teleradiology PACS.
vs iCADiCAD ProFound AI alternative
The first FDA-cleared AI for breast tomosynthesis, now owned by RadNet, the largest operator of US outpatient imaging centers.
vs ScreenPoint TransparaTranspara alternative
Dutch mammography AI sold in the US through Siemens Healthineers and Fujifilm units, with the strongest trial record in the category.
vs Cortechs.ai NeuroQuantNeuroQuant alternative
The longest-cleared brain volumetrics product in the US, bought by imaging centers, neurology groups, the VA and military hospitals.
vs Avicenna.AI CINAAvicenna AI alternative
CT triage for stroke, pulmonary embolism and spine fractures, usually bought inside a scanner or platform vendor's bundle.
vs VIDIStarVIDIStar alternative
A Greenville cardiology PACS bought by Hitachi in 2018, inherited by Fujifilm in 2021 and sold today as Synapse Select.
vs Subtle MedicalSubtle Medical alternative
Two vendor-neutral MRI acceleration products, four scanner makers with their own, and the FDA and federal purchase records behind each.
From the blog: what the PowerScribe 360 end of life means for radiology groups, how much radiology AI costs, and the full comparison of the best AI radiology software in 2026.
See how Radiological.ai reads alongside your group
One assistant that flags suspected findings, prioritizes the worklist, and drafts the structured report on X-ray, CT and MRI. You review and sign every study.
Decision support for qualified clinicians. Radiological.ai does not provide a diagnosis and is not a substitute for professional medical judgment.