Compare ยท DeepHealth
DeepHealth alternative compared with Reporting Pro, and the RadNet question
The short answer
DeepHealth is the health informatics business of RadNet, a publicly traded US imaging provider, and its reporting product is Reporting Pro, announced commercially available on June 10, 2026 after being introduced at RSNA 2025. Reporting Pro combines speech recognition, AI-generated findings and measurements, AI-generated impressions, quality assurance and structured reporting in one environment, across X-ray, ultrasound, CT, PET/CT and MRI. Groups look for a DeepHealth alternative for two reasons. The first is scope: Reporting Pro is a reporting environment, so worklist order across the whole list stays a separate question. The second is structural: RadNet operates imaging centers, so an independent practice buying DeepHealth is buying core software from an organization that competes with it for the same patients. Radiological.ai is not an imaging provider. It flags suspected findings, prioritizes the worklist and drafts the structured report, and the radiologist reviews, edits and signs.
DeepHealth arrived in the reporting conversation quickly. RadNet acquired Gleamer in March 2026 and folded it in, then launched Reporting Pro commercially on June 10, 2026, pairing speech recognition with AI-generated findings, measurements and impressions in a single reporting environment. On paper that is a serious product, and the modality coverage is genuinely broad: X-ray, ultrasound, CT, PET/CT and MRI.
Two things send groups looking for an alternative. The first is ordinary product scope. Reporting Pro is where the report gets written, and DeepHealth's own materials describe the fullest experience as arriving when it is deployed alongside the DeepHealth Diagnostic Suite for image management and workflow orchestration. If you are not buying the suite, the question of what rises to the top of the reading list is still open.
The second is not about software at all. DeepHealth is a wholly owned subsidiary of RadNet, which runs hundreds of US outpatient imaging centers. For a hospital system or an independent practice, that means the vendor holding your reporting workflow is also a competitor in your market. That is not a reason nobody should buy it, and plenty of groups will decide the product is worth it. It is a reason to ask the ownership and data questions explicitly rather than discover them at renewal.
Radiological.ai is a different shape. We do not operate imaging centers and we do not read studies in competition with our customers. The assistant flags suspected findings for your review, prioritizes the worklist so suspected urgent studies surface first, and drafts the structured report into your own template across X-ray, CT and MRI. It is decision support, and the responsible radiologist reviews, edits and signs every report.
Worklist
Structured report
DraftRun the assistant to draft this report for review.
Decision support. The radiologist reviews and signs every study.
Decision support for qualified clinicians. Radiological.ai does not provide a diagnosis and is not a substitute for professional judgment.
Flag · prioritize · draft · you review and sign
DeepHealth Reporting Pro is a capable reporting environment owned by RadNet, a US imaging provider; Radiological.ai is a vendor-neutral assistant that flags findings, prioritizes the worklist and drafts the report, and does not compete with its customers for patients.
Side by side
DeepHealth Reporting Pro vs PowerScribe One, side by side
The two reporting platforms a US group shortlists in 2026. Neither column is the sales column; both are compiled from the vendors' own published material.
| What you are comparing | DeepHealth Reporting Pro | PowerScribe One |
|---|---|---|
| Who owns it | DeepHealth, a wholly owned subsidiary of RadNet, a publicly traded US outpatient imaging operator | Microsoft, following its acquisition of Nuance |
| Commercial status | Introduced at RSNA 2025, announced commercially available June 10, 2026 | Current product and the stated upgrade path from PowerScribe 360, whose renewals and maintenance ended on August 31, 2026 |
| Speech recognition | Speech recognition built into the reporting environment | Cloud Speech, which vendor materials describe as removing per-radiologist voice profile training |
| AI-generated impression | AI-generated impressions as a named capability | Smart Impression, which drafts the impression and recommendations from dictated findings in the radiologist's own style |
| AI findings on the images | Integrates DeepHealth's own native clinical AI findings and measurements into the report | AI Findings, an integration layer surfacing third-party AI through the Precision Imaging Network rather than a native model |
| Modality coverage | Described as available across all imaging modalities, including X-ray, ultrasound, CT, PET/CT and MRI | Radiology reporting across the full reading list |
| Structured reporting | Structured reporting included in the launch capability set | Long-established template and AutoText authoring |
| Template migration | Template migration from legacy systems named as a capability | Microsoft describes a path that reuses existing PowerScribe 360 workflows and content |
| PACS and RIS integration | Described as designed to integrate with any existing PACS and RIS | Integrates with the PACS and RIS estate already common in US radiology |
| Fullest experience requires | Deployment alongside the DeepHealth Diagnostic Suite for image management and workflow orchestration | The PowerScribe One platform itself, with Dragon Copilot positioned as a companion |
| Geographic availability | United States and United Kingdom, with Australia, South Africa and select European markets stated as planned | Broad existing US install base |
| Vendor competes with you | RadNet operates outpatient imaging centers, so an independent group may share a market with its software vendor | Microsoft does not provide imaging services |
| Published list pricing | None published | None published; quoted per site through Microsoft or a reseller |
Compiled from the DeepHealth and RadNet launch announcements of June 10, 2026, the Microsoft PowerScribe One product page and Microsoft Support documentation. Both products ship on a fast release cycle, so confirm the current capability list and contract terms with each vendor before building a shortlist around this table.
Side by side
Radiological.ai vs DeepHealth, honestly
A fair look at what each does well. Both are capable tools. Here is where they differ.
| What matters | Radiological.ai | DeepHealth |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor neutrality | We do not operate imaging centers and do not compete with our customers for patients | DeepHealth is a wholly owned subsidiary of RadNet, a US outpatient imaging operator |
| Worklist triage and prioritization | Suspected urgent studies surface to the top of the queue for your review | Workflow orchestration is described as part of the wider Diagnostic Suite rather than the reporting product |
| Finding flags for review | Flags suspected findings as a second set of eyes on each study | Integrates DeepHealth's own clinical AI findings into the report |
| Structured report drafting | Drafts the report into your own template for you to edit and sign | Structured reporting and AI-generated impressions in the reporting environment |
| What you have to buy | One assistant that connects to the PACS you already run | Fullest experience described as Reporting Pro deployed with the DeepHealth Diagnostic Suite |
| Regulatory status | Decision support; we make no regulatory-status claims on this site | Check current clearances for each DeepHealth module directly with the vendor |
| Best suited for | Groups wanting one vendor-neutral assistant across flagging, triage and drafting | Sites consolidating onto the DeepHealth stack, and RadNet-affiliated operations |
Comparison reflects general, publicly understood positioning. Capabilities change, so check each product for the latest.
The comparison most groups are really running is Reporting Pro against the incumbent, which in US radiology is usually a Microsoft product. Our PowerScribe comparison covers that incumbent, and PowerScribe One vs 360 covers why the end of life dates are forcing the decision now rather than later. If your shortlist has three names on it rather than two, PowerScribe vs Fluency for Imaging covers the third.
Because Reporting Pro is a reporting environment, the drafting detail matters more than the branding. Structured radiology reporting covers drafting into your own section templates, and AI radiology reporting software covers what changes when the draft builds while you read.
The ownership question has a practical edge that shows up in the contract rather than the demo, which is why radiology report templates and vendor lock-in is worth reading before you sign, and the full alternatives hub groups every comparison by what you are actually replacing.
RadNet bought more than reporting. It also owns iCAD, whose ProFound AI is installed at many independent breast centers, so if mammography detection is part of your DeepHealth question, iCAD ProFound AI alternatives lines up the other FDA-cleared mammography AI vendors.
The same applies to neuro. RadNet folded Quantib ND into DeepHealth Brain, so if brain MRI volumetrics is on the table, NeuroQuant alternatives and pricing sets it against Cortechs.ai NeuroQuant, and icobrain alternatives after the GE HealthCare deal covers the product GE now owns.
Why groups pick Radiological.ai
One assistant across the whole read
Your software vendor is not your competitor
RadNet operates outpatient imaging centers, so an independent practice buying DeepHealth shares core workflow software with an organization competing for the same referrals. We do not read studies and do not run imaging centers, so that conversation never has to happen.
Triage is not sold separately
Reporting Pro is where the report is written, and DeepHealth positions the full experience as Reporting Pro plus the Diagnostic Suite. Radiological.ai puts flagging, worklist prioritization and drafting in one assistant that connects to the PACS you already run.
Add the assistant, keep the stack
Nothing here asks you to replace image management or adopt a suite to get the reporting benefit. The assistant connects over standard DICOM, drafts into the templates your referrers already recognize, and leaves the radiologist reviewing, editing and signing every report.
Good questions
DeepHealth vs Radiological.ai, answered
More comparisons
See how Radiological.ai compares
Aidoc alternative
One assistant across the whole read, not acute triage alone.
vs Rad AIRad AI alternative
Drafting plus flagging and triage, in one assistant.
vs Fluency for ImagingPowerScribe vs Fluency for Imaging
The two reporting platforms most US groups actually shortlist.
vs Annalise.aiAnnalise.ai alternative
Finding flags plus triage and drafting, together.
vs Nuance PowerScribeNuance PowerScribe alternative
More than dictation: flagging, triage and drafting.
vs Qure.aiQure.ai alternative
Flags plus triage and drafting, in one assistant.
vs Viz.aiViz.ai alternative
Beyond acute stroke triage, across the whole read.
vs Nuance DAXNuance DAX alternative
Built for the read, not for the patient conversation.
vs LunitLunit alternative
One assistant across the whole read, not detection on two modalities.
vs GleamerGleamer alternative
One assistant across X-ray, CT and MRI, not a suite of per-exam detectors.
vs PowerScribe OnePowerScribe One vs 360
What actually changes in the cloud move, and the third option.
vs Sirona MedicalSirona Medical alternative
Add the assistant to the PACS you already run, without replacing the stack.
vs New LanternNew Lantern alternative
AI drafting and triage on the PACS you keep, not a new platform.
vs RapidAIRapidAI alternative
Past the stroke pathway, across the whole reading list.
vs Dragon Medical OneDragon Medical One pricing
Microsoft publishes no price. Here are 25 real federal contracts that do.
vs PowerScribePowerScribe pricing
No list price exists. Here are the only verifiable numbers that do.
vs PowerScribePowerScribe templates
What AutoText actually is, how to get yours out, and what survives a migration.
vs RADPAIR and PowerScribeRadPair vs PowerScribe
Three ways to write the report, compared on what each one actually replaces.
vs Aidoc and Viz.aiAidoc vs Viz.ai
Three acute triage platforms, compared on what they were each built to do.
vs vRad (Virtual Radiologic)vRad alternative
vRad publishes no rate card. 357 federal contract awards do.
vs ONRADONRAD alternative
ONRAD publishes no rate card. 80 federal contract awards do.
vs Real RadiologyReal Radiology alternative
Real Radiology publishes no rate card. 41 Army and VA contract awards do.
vs Experity TeleradiologyExperity Teleradiology alternative
The urgent care reading service that started as one Scottsdale radiologist and now sits inside an EMR company.
vs Sectra PACSSectra PACS alternative
The PACS that keeps winning satisfaction surveys, sold as a cloud subscription with no public price.
vs Visage PACSVisage PACS alternative
The fastest-growing enterprise viewer in US radiology, priced per transaction and disclosed deal by deal.
vs Intelerad PACSIntelerad PACS alternative
The teleradiology favorite, now a GE HealthCare business, with a renewal conversation that just changed.
vs Exa PACSExa PACS alternative
Often sold alongside a Konica X-ray room, with a thin public record you should fill in before you sign.
vs GE Centricity PACSGE Centricity PACS alternative
An aging install base, three GE PACS lines under one owner, and a recall record you should read before the renewal.
vs Agfa PACSAgfa PACS alternative
A Best in KLAS platform, a federal record over $300 million, and an IMPAX install base being moved to the cloud.
vs McKesson PACSMcKesson PACS alternative
A Horizon Medical Imaging install base now owned by Optum, a $98 million federal record and a cloud PACS sold per study.
vs Mach7Mach7 alternative
A Vermont-run, ASX-listed enterprise imaging vendor with a new CEO, falling revenue and a seat on the VA teleradiology PACS.
vs iCADiCAD ProFound AI alternative
The first FDA-cleared AI for breast tomosynthesis, now owned by RadNet, the largest operator of US outpatient imaging centers.
vs ScreenPoint TransparaTranspara alternative
Dutch mammography AI sold in the US through Siemens Healthineers and Fujifilm units, with the strongest trial record in the category.
vs Cortechs.ai NeuroQuantNeuroQuant alternative
The longest-cleared brain volumetrics product in the US, bought by imaging centers, neurology groups, the VA and military hospitals.
vs Avicenna.AI CINAAvicenna AI alternative
CT triage for stroke, pulmonary embolism and spine fractures, usually bought inside a scanner or platform vendor's bundle.
vs VIDIStarVIDIStar alternative
A Greenville cardiology PACS bought by Hitachi in 2018, inherited by Fujifilm in 2021 and sold today as Synapse Select.
vs Subtle MedicalSubtle Medical alternative
Two vendor-neutral MRI acceleration products, four scanner makers with their own, and the FDA and federal purchase records behind each.
From the blog: what the PowerScribe 360 end of life means for radiology groups, how much radiology AI costs, and the full comparison of the best AI radiology software in 2026.
See how Radiological.ai reads alongside your group
One assistant that flags suspected findings, prioritizes the worklist, and drafts the structured report on X-ray, CT and MRI. You review and sign every study.
Decision support for qualified clinicians. Radiological.ai does not provide a diagnosis and is not a substitute for professional medical judgment.