Compare ยท Experity Teleradiology
Experity Teleradiology, formerly Teleradiology Specialists, compared
The short answer
Experity Teleradiology is the former Teleradiology Specialists, a Scottsdale practice founded in 2004 that joined the Experity urgent care EMR company in 2019. It sells overreads by US board-certified radiologists to urgent care clinics and publishes no rate card.
Most urgent care operators meet this service twice. Once as Teleradiology Specialists, the fast-growing Scottsdale group that read x-rays for walk-in clinics across the country, and again as a line item inside their Experity EMR contract. They are the same service. When DocuTAP and Practice Velocity merged in May 2019 to form Experity, Teleradiology Specialists came into the deal alongside Clockwise.MD and Urgent Care Consultants, and it was later renamed Experity Teleradiology.
That history matters when you are pricing overreads. Buying reads from the company that also runs your EMR, practice management and patient check-in is convenient: one vendor, one login, one support line. It also means your radiology reads are priced and renewed inside a much larger relationship, and switching one piece is harder than switching a standalone reading service. Neither is wrong. You should just know which one you are signing.
Experity does not publish per-study pricing, and neither do its competitors, so this page does not invent a rate. It sets out what is on the public record: the practice history from its own press releases, the turnaround and radiologist figures Experity publishes today, the August 2023 purchase of the OnePACS teleradiology platform, and how the offer compares with independent reading services that urgent care chains also shortlist.
There is one more option a provider-versus-provider comparison leaves out, and it is why this page sits on a software site. An overread arrives after the radiologist gets to it. An assistant that flags suspected findings as the image is acquired gives the treating clinician a second look while the patient is still in the room, and drafts the report so the overreading radiologist starts from a populated template.
Worklist
Structured report
DraftRun the assistant to draft this report for review.
Decision support. The radiologist reviews and signs every study.
Decision support for qualified clinicians. Radiological.ai does not provide a diagnosis and is not a substitute for professional judgment.
Flag · prioritize · draft · you review and sign
Experity Teleradiology sells radiologist overreads to urgent care clinics, usually alongside the Experity EMR. Radiological.ai sells none of that: it is an assistant that flags suspected findings on the image as it is acquired, prioritizes the worklist and drafts the structured report, so a clinician gets a second look before discharge and the radiologist who reads for you gets through more studies.
Side by side
Experity Teleradiology against an independent reading service
What an urgent care operator is actually choosing between. The right-hand column uses the published facts of independent providers we have covered: Vesta, Real Radiology and vRad.
| What to compare | Experity Teleradiology | Independent reading service |
|---|---|---|
| Who you sign with | Experity, the urgent care software company in Machesney Park, Illinois, formed in 2019 with Warburg Pincus financing. | A radiology practice or teleradiology company whose only product is reads, such as radiologist-owned Real Radiology or Vesta in Florida. |
| Relationship to your EMR | Sold as part of the Experity suite next to EMR and practice management, patient engagement and billing services. | Separate vendor. Images reach it through your PACS or an image-sharing link, whatever EMR you run. |
| Published turnaround | STAT under 15 minutes and routine in 23 minutes on average, per Experity. | Varies. Vesta states STAT within 30 minutes; Real Radiology reported a 20-minute average in 2019. |
| Radiologist panel | More than 90 US board-certified radiologists, per its buyers guide listing. | From a few dozen radiologists at regional groups to hundreds at vRad. |
| Price published | No. Quoted per clinic. | No. Quoted per facility, usually per study or per modality. |
| Imaging platform | Owns OnePACS, a cloud teleradiology PACS, since August 2023. | Uses its own or a third-party PACS; ask who holds your images if you leave. |
| AI in the workflow | Says it added FDA-cleared AI fracture detection to overreads, finishing them 10 to 15 percent faster. | Depends on the provider. Ask which algorithm, and whether the clinician ever sees the flag. |
| Switching cost | Higher. Reads renew inside a broader software contract. | Lower. One service agreement, one notice period. |
Experity figures are the company's own published claims, collected September 26, 2026 from its teleradiology page, its press releases and its Urgent Care Buyers Guide listing, plus the 2017 and 2019 Inc. 5000 announcements issued by Teleradiology Specialists. Averages are vendor-reported and not independently audited. Independent-provider facts come from our Vesta, Real Radiology and vRad pages. A USAspending.gov search on September 26, 2026 found no federal prime awards under Experity, Practice Velocity, Teleradiology Specialists or OnePACS, so there is no public contract price to benchmark.
From one radiologist to an EMR add-on
How Teleradiology Specialists became Experity Teleradiology
The dates and figures an operator should know before signing, each from a named public source.
| Milestone | Figure | What it means for your contract |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2004, solo practice | Dr. David Cohen read alone until the first hires in 2009, and it became a full teleradiology service in 2010. The urgent care focus was there from the start. |
| Scale in 2017 | 1,720 locations in 45 states | Its own release reported $13.4 million in revenue, 40 employees and a 600 percent revenue increase from 2013 to 2016, ranking No. 758 on the Inc. 5000. |
| Inc. 5000 in 2019 | No. 1,995, 201 percent growth | The third year running on the list, with a promised turnaround of 20 minutes or less for primary care, occupational health and urgent care clients. |
| Became part of Experity | May 9, 2019 | DocuTAP and Practice Velocity merged as Experity, serving more than 4,000 clinics, and Teleradiology Specialists came in with the deal. |
| Bought OnePACS | August 2023 | Experity now owns the cloud PACS the reads flow through. Ask how your images and priors are exported if you move the reads elsewhere. |
| Published turnaround today | STAT under 15 minutes, routine 23 | Vendor averages, not medians. Write turnaround by priority into the contract with a remedy when it is missed. |
| Market position claimed | About half of US urgent care | Experity says nearly 50 percent of urgent care centers use its solutions. Size gives you a proven service, and gives them leverage at renewal. |
Sources: Teleradiology Specialists Inc. 5000 releases on PR Newswire (2017) and BioSpace (August 14, 2019), the Experity merger announcement of May 9, 2019, the Experity OnePACS release (August 2023), the Experity teleradiology page and its Urgent Care Buyers Guide listing, all read September 26, 2026. Revenue, headcount and location counts are from 2017 and are not current.
Side by side
Radiological.ai vs Experity Teleradiology, honestly
A fair look at what each does well. Both are capable tools. Here is where they differ.
| What matters | Radiological.ai | Experity Teleradiology |
|---|---|---|
| What you are buying | Software. It flags suspected findings on the image, prioritizes the worklist and drafts the structured report. | Radiologist overreads of your clinic x-rays and other studies, signed by a board-certified US radiologist. |
| When the second look happens | As the image is acquired, so the clinician can act before the patient is discharged. | When the radiologist reads it: under 15 minutes for STAT and 23 minutes routine on average, per Experity. |
| Who signs the report | The radiologist who reads for you. The assistant never signs anything. | An Experity Teleradiology radiologist. |
| Unit of cost | Per reading radiologist, published: $399 a month on the Practice plan or $199 a month billed annually, and $598 a month on the Group plan or $299 a month billed annually. | Not published. Quoted per clinic, often inside the wider Experity contract. |
| Tied to an EMR | No. It works alongside the PACS and reporting tools you already run. | Sold as part of the Experity urgent care suite. |
| Best suited for | Radiology groups that read for urgent care chains and need more studies per radiologist hour, and clinics that want a flag before discharge. | Urgent care operators with no radiologist of their own who want one vendor for software and reads. |
Comparison reflects general, publicly understood positioning. Capabilities change, so check each product for the latest.
This page covers one urgent care reading service. For the clinic-side decision in general, x-ray overread services for urgent care covers turnaround, liability and contract terms, and Vesta Teleradiology alternatives compares the no-minimum provider that low-volume clinics often shortlist.
For the national providers, Real Radiology teleradiology cost, the vRad cost page and the ONRAD cost page each break down a federal contract record, and teleradiology pricing works through per-study, per-hour and retainer models.
On the software side, radiology overread services shows how the assistant supports preliminary reads on plain films, and our pricing is published per radiologist so you can compare both models without a sales call.
Why groups pick Radiological.ai
One assistant across the whole read
Know what you are bundling
Buying reads from your EMR vendor is simple until renewal, when radiology is one line in a larger negotiation. Ask for the teleradiology price as a separate, itemized schedule with its own term and its own exit, so you can benchmark it against a standalone reading service every year.
A read after discharge is a callback
Urgent care overreads usually land after the patient has left. A missed fracture then becomes a phone call, a recall and sometimes a claim. Getting a suspected finding in front of the clinician while the patient is still in the room changes that, which is the gap our assistant is built for.
Own your images and priors
Experity owns the PACS its reads flow through. Before you sign, get in writing how studies and prior reports are exported, in what format, how fast and at what cost if you ever take the reads to another provider.
Decision support, a radiologist always signs
Every flag is a prompt to look again and every report is a draft. The responsible radiologist reviews, edits and signs each study. We publish no accuracy figures and make no regulatory-status claims on this site.
Good questions
Experity Teleradiology vs Radiological.ai, answered
More comparisons
See how Radiological.ai compares
Aidoc alternative
One assistant across the whole read, not acute triage alone.
vs Rad AIRad AI alternative
Drafting plus flagging and triage, in one assistant.
vs DeepHealthDeepHealth alternative
Reporting AI without buying it from a competitor.
vs Fluency for ImagingPowerScribe vs Fluency for Imaging
The two reporting platforms most US groups actually shortlist.
vs Annalise.aiAnnalise.ai alternative
Finding flags plus triage and drafting, together.
vs Nuance PowerScribeNuance PowerScribe alternative
More than dictation: flagging, triage and drafting.
vs Qure.aiQure.ai alternative
Flags plus triage and drafting, in one assistant.
vs Viz.aiViz.ai alternative
Beyond acute stroke triage, across the whole read.
vs Nuance DAXNuance DAX alternative
Built for the read, not for the patient conversation.
vs LunitLunit alternative
One assistant across the whole read, not detection on two modalities.
vs GleamerGleamer alternative
One assistant across X-ray, CT and MRI, not a suite of per-exam detectors.
vs PowerScribe OnePowerScribe One vs 360
What actually changes in the cloud move, and the third option.
vs Sirona MedicalSirona Medical alternative
Add the assistant to the PACS you already run, without replacing the stack.
vs New LanternNew Lantern alternative
AI drafting and triage on the PACS you keep, not a new platform.
vs RapidAIRapidAI alternative
Past the stroke pathway, across the whole reading list.
vs Dragon Medical OneDragon Medical One pricing
Microsoft publishes no price. Here are 25 real federal contracts that do.
vs PowerScribePowerScribe pricing
No list price exists. Here are the only verifiable numbers that do.
vs PowerScribePowerScribe templates
What AutoText actually is, how to get yours out, and what survives a migration.
vs RADPAIR and PowerScribeRadPair vs PowerScribe
Three ways to write the report, compared on what each one actually replaces.
vs Aidoc and Viz.aiAidoc vs Viz.ai
Three acute triage platforms, compared on what they were each built to do.
vs vRad (Virtual Radiologic)vRad alternative
vRad publishes no rate card. 357 federal contract awards do.
vs ONRADONRAD alternative
ONRAD publishes no rate card. 80 federal contract awards do.
vs Real RadiologyReal Radiology alternative
Real Radiology publishes no rate card. 41 Army and VA contract awards do.
vs Sectra PACSSectra PACS alternative
The PACS that keeps winning satisfaction surveys, sold as a cloud subscription with no public price.
vs Visage PACSVisage PACS alternative
The fastest-growing enterprise viewer in US radiology, priced per transaction and disclosed deal by deal.
vs Intelerad PACSIntelerad PACS alternative
The teleradiology favorite, now a GE HealthCare business, with a renewal conversation that just changed.
vs Exa PACSExa PACS alternative
Often sold alongside a Konica X-ray room, with a thin public record you should fill in before you sign.
vs GE Centricity PACSGE Centricity PACS alternative
An aging install base, three GE PACS lines under one owner, and a recall record you should read before the renewal.
vs Agfa PACSAgfa PACS alternative
A Best in KLAS platform, a federal record over $300 million, and an IMPAX install base being moved to the cloud.
vs McKesson PACSMcKesson PACS alternative
A Horizon Medical Imaging install base now owned by Optum, a $98 million federal record and a cloud PACS sold per study.
vs Mach7Mach7 alternative
A Vermont-run, ASX-listed enterprise imaging vendor with a new CEO, falling revenue and a seat on the VA teleradiology PACS.
vs iCADiCAD ProFound AI alternative
The first FDA-cleared AI for breast tomosynthesis, now owned by RadNet, the largest operator of US outpatient imaging centers.
vs ScreenPoint TransparaTranspara alternative
Dutch mammography AI sold in the US through Siemens Healthineers and Fujifilm units, with the strongest trial record in the category.
vs Cortechs.ai NeuroQuantNeuroQuant alternative
The longest-cleared brain volumetrics product in the US, bought by imaging centers, neurology groups, the VA and military hospitals.
vs Avicenna.AI CINAAvicenna AI alternative
CT triage for stroke, pulmonary embolism and spine fractures, usually bought inside a scanner or platform vendor's bundle.
vs VIDIStarVIDIStar alternative
A Greenville cardiology PACS bought by Hitachi in 2018, inherited by Fujifilm in 2021 and sold today as Synapse Select.
vs Subtle MedicalSubtle Medical alternative
Two vendor-neutral MRI acceleration products, four scanner makers with their own, and the FDA and federal purchase records behind each.
From the blog: what the PowerScribe 360 end of life means for radiology groups, how much radiology AI costs, and the full comparison of the best AI radiology software in 2026.
See how Radiological.ai reads alongside your group
One assistant that flags suspected findings, prioritizes the worklist, and drafts the structured report on X-ray, CT and MRI. You review and sign every study.
Decision support for qualified clinicians. Radiological.ai does not provide a diagnosis and is not a substitute for professional medical judgment.