Compare ยท Aidoc
Aidoc Pricing and What an Aidoc Quote Should Itemize for Radiology Departments
The short answer
Aidoc does not publish a price list, so any dollar figure you find online for an Aidoc subscription is a guess or comes from an unrelated deal. The public record gives you three things instead. The openFDA database lists 35 clearances under Aidoc Medical, Ltd., 25 of them triage notification under product code QAS, which tells you how many separate modules a quote can contain. Searches of USAspending.gov on October 31, 2026 found no federal prime award to Aidoc, so no public contract sets a benchmark. Ask for an itemized quote by module, site, scanner count and contract term.
Radiology directors and imaging administrators searching for Aidoc pricing usually find the same thing: a demo request form. Aidoc sells an AI platform made of many separately cleared modules for CT and X-ray triage, such as intracranial hemorrhage, pulmonary embolism, rib fractures and body CT, and it quotes them per health system. There is no public rate card, no self-serve checkout and no federal contract to point at.
That does not leave you empty handed. The FDA record shows exactly which modules exist and when each was cleared, so you can make the vendor name every module in the proposal instead of accepting a single bundled number. The structure of a platform quote, which drives the final bill, is the same across the category.
This page does not guess a price. It gives you the verified facts and the line items to demand, then shows where a reading assistant fits next to a triage platform, because the two solve different problems and are bought by different budgets.
Worklist
Structured report
DraftRun the assistant to draft this report for review.
Decision support. The radiologist reviews and signs every study.
Decision support for qualified clinicians. Radiological.ai does not provide a diagnosis and is not a substitute for professional judgment.
Flag · prioritize · draft · you review and sign
Aidoc publishes no price, so the honest answer is the public record: 35 FDA clearances, no federal award to benchmark against, and a line-item list to make the vendor fill in.
Side by side
What is publicly known about Aidoc cost
Each row is a sourced fact or an explicit gap. Nothing here is a quote.
| What to check | Aidoc | What it means for your quote |
|---|---|---|
| Published price list | None. Pricing is by quote. | Treat every third party estimate as unverified. Ask for the proposal in writing with a line per module. |
| Number of FDA clearances | 35 records under the applicant name Aidoc Medical, Ltd., from K180647 in August 2018 to K261317 in May 2026. | Thirty five records is not thirty five products you must buy. Ask which modules are in your quote and which are optional later. |
| Type of clearance | 25 triage notification (QAS), 5 triage of other findings (QFM), 4 quantification (QIH), 1 under JAK. | Most of the portfolio is notification software. Quantification modules are a different clinical use and may be priced separately. |
| Federal purchasing record | USAspending.gov searches for Aidoc Medical and aiOS returned no prime award to Aidoc. A plain Aidoc keyword search returns only unrelated USAID records. | There is no public award to benchmark against, unlike RapidAI, which has named VA awards. Your leverage is competing quotes. |
| Deployment scope | Quoted per health system, with the modules selected, the number of sites and the scan volume as common inputs. | Ask whether adding a site, a scanner or a module changes the price and by how much, in writing. |
| Contract shape | Subscription term and renewal terms are negotiated. | Get the renewal uplift cap, the termination rights and the data and image retention terms before you sign. |
| Reading and reporting workflow | Triage and worklist prioritization. Aidoc flags the study and reorders the list. | It does not draft the radiology report. That is a separate purchase and a separate budget line. |
Sources are openFDA (collected October 31, 2026) and USAspending.gov award searches run October 31, 2026. A zero result in a federal search does not prove that no agency buys the product through a reseller or another vehicle.
The public clearance record
The most recent Aidoc clearances a quote can draw from
Each record is a separate FDA submission for a named module. Ask which of these your proposal actually includes.
| Module | FDA record | What to check |
|---|---|---|
| BriefCase-Triage | K261317, May 14, 2026, QAS | The newest record. Confirm which indication it covers and whether it is in your base price. |
| BriefCase-Triage CARE Multi-Triage CT for pneumothorax and pericardial effusion | K253578, February 26, 2026, QAS | A multi-finding CT module. Ask whether it replaces single-finding modules you already pay for. |
| BriefCase-Triage | K251195, January 27, 2026, QAS | Another triage indication. Ask for the indication name, not only the product family. |
| BriefCase-Triage CARE Multi-Triage CT Body | K252970, January 7, 2026, QAS | Body CT triage across several findings. The breadth of a multi-triage module is the main price driver to question. |
| BriefCase-Triage | K253265, November 6, 2025, QAS | Triage notification. Verify the modality, CT or X-ray, before you compare quotes. |
| BriefCase-Triage | K251406, May 30, 2025, QAS | Triage notification. Check how many of your study types it actually touches. |
| BriefCase-Triage | K243548, December 11, 2024, QFM | Cleared under the code for triage of other findings. |
| BriefCase-Quantification | K242203, November 22, 2024, QIH | Quantification is measurement, not notification. Ask whether it is priced as an add-on. |
| BriefCase-Quantification | K241112, May 15, 2024, QIH | A second quantification record. Check which measurement it supports. |
| BriefCase, Rib Fractures Triage | K202992, April 14, 2021, QFM | An earlier, narrow module. A useful example of a single-finding line item. |
Source is openFDA, collected October 31, 2026. The applicant name appears as Aidoc Medical, Ltd. A clearance belongs to the named device and its intended use, so match each module to the indication you plan to use.
Side by side
Radiological.ai vs Aidoc, honestly
A fair look at what each does well. Both are capable tools. Here is where they differ.
| What matters | Radiological.ai | Aidoc |
|---|---|---|
| What you are buying | A reading assistant that flags suspected findings, prioritizes the worklist and drafts the structured report | A triage and worklist prioritization platform made of separately cleared modules |
| Who feels the benefit | The reading radiologist, in report turnaround and worklist order | The department, in time from scan to a flagged critical study |
| Pricing basis | Practice covers X-ray and CT at $199 per reading radiologist per month billed annually, or $399 month to month | No public price. Quoted per health system with modules, sites and volume as inputs |
| Integration | Works alongside your PACS over DICOM and returns results over HL7 or FHIR | Connects to scanners and PACS and pushes flags into the worklist |
| Review | Decision support. The radiologist reviews, edits and signs every report | Cleared notification software. The radiologist confirms on the images |
Comparison reflects general, publicly understood positioning. Capabilities change, so check each product for the latest.
For the three-way view of the acute triage platforms and where each product stops, see Aidoc vs Viz.ai vs RapidAI. If you are weighing a switch rather than a purchase, the Aidoc alternative page covers what changes when the reading side is added.
Platform contracts in this category share the same traps. Our guide to radiology AI platform pricing shows what public award records reveal about per module billing, and radiology AI vendor evaluation questions lists what to ask before the demo. The same question for two rivals is answered in Viz.ai pricing and RapidAI pricing and cost. Reporting side costs sit on the Radiological.ai pricing page.
Why groups pick Radiological.ai
One assistant across the whole read
Make the quote itemize every module
A single platform number hides what you are paying for. Ask for a line per cleared module, with the FDA record it relies on, so you can see what is core and what is an optional add. If a module you do not plan to use is bundled, ask what the price is without it.
Price the scale, not the pilot
A quote for one hospital can look very different from a multi-site system. Ask for the price at your current footprint and at the footprint you expect in three years, and get the per site and per scanner add-on cost written down.
Cap the renewal
Subscription AI is where renewal uplifts hide. Ask for a written cap on annual increases, the notice period for non-renewal and what happens to your configuration and history if you leave.
Do not confuse triage with reporting
Triage platforms shorten the time to the right study. They do not write the report. If report turnaround is the bottleneck, a reading assistant solves a different problem and is bought from a different budget, so compare the two on what each one removes from your day.
Good questions
Aidoc vs Radiological.ai, answered
More comparisons
See how Radiological.ai compares
Aidoc alternative
One assistant across the whole read, not acute triage alone.
vs Rad AIRad AI alternative
Drafting plus flagging and triage, in one assistant.
vs DeepHealthDeepHealth alternative
Reporting AI without buying it from a competitor.
vs Fluency for ImagingPowerScribe vs Fluency for Imaging
The two reporting platforms most US groups actually shortlist.
vs Annalise.aiAnnalise.ai alternative
Finding flags plus triage and drafting, together.
vs Nuance PowerScribeNuance PowerScribe alternative
More than dictation: flagging, triage and drafting.
vs Qure.aiQure.ai alternative
Flags plus triage and drafting, in one assistant.
vs Viz.aiViz.ai alternative
Beyond acute stroke triage, across the whole read.
vs Nuance DAXNuance DAX alternative
Built for the read, not for the patient conversation.
vs LunitLunit alternative
One assistant across the whole read, not detection on two modalities.
vs GleamerGleamer alternative
One assistant across X-ray, CT and MRI, not a suite of per-exam detectors.
vs PowerScribe OnePowerScribe One vs 360
What actually changes in the cloud move, and the third option.
vs Sirona MedicalSirona Medical alternative
Add the assistant to the PACS you already run, without replacing the stack.
vs New LanternNew Lantern alternative
AI drafting and triage on the PACS you keep, not a new platform.
vs RapidAIRapidAI alternative
Past the stroke pathway, across the whole reading list.
vs Dragon Medical OneDragon Medical One pricing
Microsoft publishes no price. Here are 25 real federal contracts that do.
vs PowerScribePowerScribe pricing
No list price exists. Here are the only verifiable numbers that do.
vs PowerScribePowerScribe templates
What AutoText actually is, how to get yours out, and what survives a migration.
vs RADPAIR and PowerScribeRadPair vs PowerScribe
Three ways to write the report, compared on what each one actually replaces.
vs Aidoc and Viz.aiAidoc vs Viz.ai
Three acute triage platforms, compared on what they were each built to do.
vs vRad (Virtual Radiologic)vRad alternative
vRad publishes no rate card. 357 federal contract awards do.
vs ONRADONRAD alternative
ONRAD publishes no rate card. 80 federal contract awards do.
vs Real RadiologyReal Radiology alternative
Real Radiology publishes no rate card. 41 Army and VA contract awards do.
vs Experity TeleradiologyExperity Teleradiology alternative
The urgent care reading service that started as one Scottsdale radiologist and now sits inside an EMR company.
vs Sectra PACSSectra PACS alternative
The PACS that keeps winning satisfaction surveys, sold as a cloud subscription with no public price.
vs Visage PACSVisage PACS alternative
The fastest-growing enterprise viewer in US radiology, priced per transaction and disclosed deal by deal.
vs Intelerad PACSIntelerad PACS alternative
The teleradiology favorite, now a GE HealthCare business, with a renewal conversation that just changed.
vs Exa PACSExa PACS alternative
Often sold alongside a Konica X-ray room, with a thin public record you should fill in before you sign.
vs GE Centricity PACSGE Centricity PACS alternative
An aging install base, three GE PACS lines under one owner, and a recall record you should read before the renewal.
vs Agfa PACSAgfa PACS alternative
A Best in KLAS platform, a federal record over $300 million, and an IMPAX install base being moved to the cloud.
vs McKesson PACSMcKesson PACS alternative
A Horizon Medical Imaging install base now owned by Optum, a $98 million federal record and a cloud PACS sold per study.
vs Mach7Mach7 alternative
A Vermont-run, ASX-listed enterprise imaging vendor with a new CEO, falling revenue and a seat on the VA teleradiology PACS.
vs iCADiCAD ProFound AI alternative
The first FDA-cleared AI for breast tomosynthesis, now owned by RadNet, the largest operator of US outpatient imaging centers.
vs ScreenPoint TransparaTranspara alternative
Dutch mammography AI sold in the US through Siemens Healthineers and Fujifilm units, with the strongest trial record in the category.
vs Cortechs.ai NeuroQuantNeuroQuant alternative
The longest-cleared brain volumetrics product in the US, bought by imaging centers, neurology groups, the VA and military hospitals.
vs Avicenna.AI CINAAvicenna AI alternative
CT triage for stroke, pulmonary embolism and spine fractures, usually bought inside a scanner or platform vendor's bundle.
vs VIDIStarVIDIStar alternative
A Greenville cardiology PACS bought by Hitachi in 2018, inherited by Fujifilm in 2021 and sold today as Synapse Select.
vs Subtle MedicalSubtle Medical alternative
Two vendor-neutral MRI acceleration products, four scanner makers with their own, and the FDA and federal purchase records behind each.
vs Riverain ClearRead CTClearRead CT alternative
Compare the lung CT CAD clearance record, VA orders and support for the whole read.
vs Nanox AI (formerly Zebra Medical Vision)Nanox AI alternative
Compare calcium scoring, bone health, liver fat and the report workflow.
vs Viz.aiViz.ai pricing
No list price exists. Here is the public record and the quote checklist.
vs LunitLunit pricing
No list price exists. Here is the public record and the quote checklist.
vs Blackford AI (Blackford Analysis, formerly Bayer Calantic)Blackford AI alternative
Compare ownership, app catalogs, FDA records and contract terms after the Azra AI deal.
From the blog: what the PowerScribe 360 end of life means for radiology groups, how much radiology AI costs, and the full comparison of the best AI radiology software in 2026.
See how Radiological.ai reads alongside your group
One assistant that flags suspected findings, prioritizes the worklist, and drafts the structured report on X-ray, CT and MRI. You review and sign every study.
Decision support for qualified clinicians. Radiological.ai does not provide a diagnosis and is not a substitute for professional medical judgment.