Compare ยท Viz.ai
Viz.ai Pricing and What a Viz.ai Quote Should Itemize for Stroke Programs
The short answer
Viz.ai does not publish a price list, so any dollar figure you find online for a Viz.ai subscription comes from an unrelated deal or is a guess. The public record gives you three things instead. The openFDA database lists 11 Viz.ai clearances, which tells you how many separate modules a quote can contain. CMS granted Viz LVO a New Technology Add-on Payment of up to $1,040 per eligible patient, which is a reimbursement figure and not a software price. A USAspending.gov search on October 30, 2026 found no federal prime awards naming Viz.ai. Ask for an itemized quote by module, site, scanner count and contract term.
Hospital stroke coordinators and imaging administrators searching for Viz.ai pricing usually find the same thing: a sales form. Viz.ai sells a platform of separate AI modules for large vessel occlusion, intracranial hemorrhage, aneurysm, subdural hemorrhage, aortic and cardiac conditions, and it quotes them per hospital. There is no public rate card, no self-serve checkout and no federal contract to point at.
That does not leave you empty handed. The FDA record shows exactly which modules exist and when each was cleared, so you can make the vendor name every module in the proposal instead of accepting a single bundled number. The Medicare record shows what the government is willing to pay on the hospital side for one specific use. And the structure of a platform quote, which is what drives the final bill, is the same across the category.
This page does not guess a price. It gives you the verified facts and the line items to demand, then shows where a reading assistant fits next to a triage platform, because the two solve different problems and are bought by different budgets.
Worklist
Structured report
DraftRun the assistant to draft this report for review.
Decision support. The radiologist reviews and signs every study.
Decision support for qualified clinicians. Radiological.ai does not provide a diagnosis and is not a substitute for professional judgment.
Flag · prioritize · draft · you review and sign
Viz.ai publishes no price, so the honest answer is the public record: 11 FDA clearances, a $1,040 Medicare add-on payment for Viz LVO, and a line-item list to make the vendor fill in.
Side by side
What is publicly known about Viz.ai cost
Each row is a sourced fact or an explicit gap. Nothing here is a quote.
| What to check | Viz.ai | What it means for your quote |
|---|---|---|
| Published price list | None. Pricing is by quote. | Treat every third party estimate as unverified. Ask for the proposal in writing with a line per module. |
| Number of FDA clearances | 11 records under the applicant name Viz. Ai, Inc., from Viz CTP in 2018 to Viz Subdural Plus in June 2025. | Eleven records is not eleven products you must buy. Ask which modules are in your quote and which are optional later. |
| Medicare add-on payment | CMS granted Viz LVO the first New Technology Add-on Payment awarded to AI software, up to $1,040 per eligible patient, and later renewed it. | This reimburses eligible inpatient stays. It is not the license fee, and it applies only to that product under CMS eligibility rules. |
| Federal purchasing record | A USAspending.gov search on October 30, 2026 returned no prime awards naming Viz.ai. | There is no public award to benchmark against, unlike PowerScribe or Aidoc style federal buys. Your leverage is competing quotes. |
| Deployment scope | Quoted per hospital or system, with the number of CT scanners and spoke hospitals feeding the platform as common inputs. | Ask whether adding a spoke hospital, a scanner or a module changes the price and by how much, in writing. |
| Contract shape | Subscription term and renewal terms are negotiated. | Get the renewal uplift cap, the termination rights and the data and image retention terms before you sign. |
| Reading and reporting workflow | Triage and care coordination. Viz.ai alerts the team and routes the case. | It does not draft the radiology report. That is a separate purchase and a separate budget line. |
Sources are openFDA (collected October 30, 2026), CMS New Technology Add-on Payment announcements and a USAspending.gov award search run October 30, 2026. A zero result in a federal search does not prove that no agency buys the product through a reseller or another vehicle.
The public clearance record
The 11 Viz.ai clearances a quote can draw from
Each record is a separate FDA submission for a named module. Ask which of these your proposal actually includes.
| Module | FDA record | What to check |
|---|---|---|
| Viz Subdural Plus | K250354, June 10, 2025, QIH | The newest record. Confirm whether it is bundled with the hemorrhage modules or sold on its own. |
| Viz HDS, Viz Volume Plus, Viz ICH Plus | K232363, February 5, 2024, QIH | Hemorrhage detection and quantification. Ask whether volume measurement is included in the base price. |
| Viz HCM | DEN230003, August 3, 2023, QXO | A De Novo record for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. A different clinical program and likely a different budget owner. |
| Viz AAA | K223443, March 17, 2023, QFM | Aortic aneurysm triage. Relevant to vascular and emergency pathways rather than stroke. |
| Viz LVO ContaCT | K223042, October 21, 2022, QAS | The large vessel occlusion module behind the Medicare add-on payment. |
| Viz RV/LV | K221100, August 29, 2022, QIH | Right to left ventricular ratio for pulmonary embolism pathways. |
| Viz SDH | K220439, July 25, 2022, QAS | Subdural hemorrhage notification. |
| Viz Aneurysm and Viz ANX | K213319, February 18, 2022, QFM | Intracranial aneurysm triage. |
| Viz ICH | K210209, March 23, 2021, QAS | Intracranial hemorrhage notification. An earlier Viz ICH record, K193658, dates from March 18, 2020. |
| Viz CTP | K180161, April 20, 2018, LLZ | CT perfusion image processing, cleared under the image management and processing code. |
Source is openFDA, collected October 30, 2026. The applicant name appears as Viz. Ai, Inc. A clearance belongs to the named device and its intended use, so match each module to the indication you plan to use.
Side by side
Radiological.ai vs Viz.ai, honestly
A fair look at what each does well. Both are capable tools. Here is where they differ.
| What matters | Radiological.ai | Viz.ai |
|---|---|---|
| What you are buying | A reading assistant that flags suspected findings, prioritizes the worklist and drafts the structured report | A triage and care coordination platform made of separately cleared modules |
| Who feels the benefit | The reading radiologist, in report turnaround and worklist order | The stroke team, in time from scan to specialist notification |
| Pricing basis | Practice covers X-ray and CT at $199 per reading radiologist per month billed annually, or $399 month to month | No public price. Quoted per hospital with modules, sites and scanners as inputs |
| Integration | Works alongside your PACS over DICOM and returns results over HL7 or FHIR | Connects to scanners and PACS and pushes alerts to the care team |
| Review | Decision support. The radiologist reviews, edits and signs every report | Cleared notification software. The clinician confirms on the images |
Comparison reflects general, publicly understood positioning. Capabilities change, so check each product for the latest.
For the three-way view of the acute triage platforms, including the Medicare add-on payment and where each product stops, see Aidoc vs Viz.ai vs RapidAI. If you are weighing a switch rather than a purchase, the Viz.ai alternative page covers what changes when the reading side is added.
Platform contracts in this category share the same traps. Our guide to radiology AI platform pricing shows what public award records reveal about per module billing, and radiology AI vendor evaluation questions lists what to ask before the demo. The RapidAI side of the same question, with 12 named VA awards, is in RapidAI pricing and cost. Reporting side costs sit on the Radiological.ai pricing page.
Why groups pick Radiological.ai
One assistant across the whole read
Make the quote itemize every module
A single platform number hides what you are paying for. Ask for a line per cleared module, with the FDA record it relies on, so you can see what is core and what is an optional add. If a module you do not plan to use is bundled, ask what the price is without it.
Separate the license from the reimbursement
The $1,040 Medicare add-on payment is attached to eligible inpatient stays for Viz LVO. It can offset cost only where your cases qualify, and only for that product. Model it as a possible revenue offset in your business case, never as the price of the software.
Price the scale, not the pilot
Quotes for a single comprehensive stroke center can look very different from a hub and spoke network with a dozen feeding hospitals. Ask for the price at your current footprint and at the footprint you expect in three years, and get the per site add-on cost written down.
Do not confuse triage with reporting
Triage platforms shorten the time to the right clinician. They do not write the report. If report turnaround is the bottleneck, a reading assistant solves a different problem and is bought from a different budget, so compare the two on what each one removes from your day.
Good questions
Viz.ai vs Radiological.ai, answered
More comparisons
See how Radiological.ai compares
Aidoc alternative
One assistant across the whole read, not acute triage alone.
vs Rad AIRad AI alternative
Drafting plus flagging and triage, in one assistant.
vs DeepHealthDeepHealth alternative
Reporting AI without buying it from a competitor.
vs Fluency for ImagingPowerScribe vs Fluency for Imaging
The two reporting platforms most US groups actually shortlist.
vs Annalise.aiAnnalise.ai alternative
Finding flags plus triage and drafting, together.
vs Nuance PowerScribeNuance PowerScribe alternative
More than dictation: flagging, triage and drafting.
vs Qure.aiQure.ai alternative
Flags plus triage and drafting, in one assistant.
vs Viz.aiViz.ai alternative
Beyond acute stroke triage, across the whole read.
vs Nuance DAXNuance DAX alternative
Built for the read, not for the patient conversation.
vs LunitLunit alternative
One assistant across the whole read, not detection on two modalities.
vs GleamerGleamer alternative
One assistant across X-ray, CT and MRI, not a suite of per-exam detectors.
vs PowerScribe OnePowerScribe One vs 360
What actually changes in the cloud move, and the third option.
vs Sirona MedicalSirona Medical alternative
Add the assistant to the PACS you already run, without replacing the stack.
vs New LanternNew Lantern alternative
AI drafting and triage on the PACS you keep, not a new platform.
vs RapidAIRapidAI alternative
Past the stroke pathway, across the whole reading list.
vs Dragon Medical OneDragon Medical One pricing
Microsoft publishes no price. Here are 25 real federal contracts that do.
vs PowerScribePowerScribe pricing
No list price exists. Here are the only verifiable numbers that do.
vs PowerScribePowerScribe templates
What AutoText actually is, how to get yours out, and what survives a migration.
vs RADPAIR and PowerScribeRadPair vs PowerScribe
Three ways to write the report, compared on what each one actually replaces.
vs Aidoc and Viz.aiAidoc vs Viz.ai
Three acute triage platforms, compared on what they were each built to do.
vs vRad (Virtual Radiologic)vRad alternative
vRad publishes no rate card. 357 federal contract awards do.
vs ONRADONRAD alternative
ONRAD publishes no rate card. 80 federal contract awards do.
vs Real RadiologyReal Radiology alternative
Real Radiology publishes no rate card. 41 Army and VA contract awards do.
vs Experity TeleradiologyExperity Teleradiology alternative
The urgent care reading service that started as one Scottsdale radiologist and now sits inside an EMR company.
vs Sectra PACSSectra PACS alternative
The PACS that keeps winning satisfaction surveys, sold as a cloud subscription with no public price.
vs Visage PACSVisage PACS alternative
The fastest-growing enterprise viewer in US radiology, priced per transaction and disclosed deal by deal.
vs Intelerad PACSIntelerad PACS alternative
The teleradiology favorite, now a GE HealthCare business, with a renewal conversation that just changed.
vs Exa PACSExa PACS alternative
Often sold alongside a Konica X-ray room, with a thin public record you should fill in before you sign.
vs GE Centricity PACSGE Centricity PACS alternative
An aging install base, three GE PACS lines under one owner, and a recall record you should read before the renewal.
vs Agfa PACSAgfa PACS alternative
A Best in KLAS platform, a federal record over $300 million, and an IMPAX install base being moved to the cloud.
vs McKesson PACSMcKesson PACS alternative
A Horizon Medical Imaging install base now owned by Optum, a $98 million federal record and a cloud PACS sold per study.
vs Mach7Mach7 alternative
A Vermont-run, ASX-listed enterprise imaging vendor with a new CEO, falling revenue and a seat on the VA teleradiology PACS.
vs iCADiCAD ProFound AI alternative
The first FDA-cleared AI for breast tomosynthesis, now owned by RadNet, the largest operator of US outpatient imaging centers.
vs ScreenPoint TransparaTranspara alternative
Dutch mammography AI sold in the US through Siemens Healthineers and Fujifilm units, with the strongest trial record in the category.
vs Cortechs.ai NeuroQuantNeuroQuant alternative
The longest-cleared brain volumetrics product in the US, bought by imaging centers, neurology groups, the VA and military hospitals.
vs Avicenna.AI CINAAvicenna AI alternative
CT triage for stroke, pulmonary embolism and spine fractures, usually bought inside a scanner or platform vendor's bundle.
vs VIDIStarVIDIStar alternative
A Greenville cardiology PACS bought by Hitachi in 2018, inherited by Fujifilm in 2021 and sold today as Synapse Select.
vs Subtle MedicalSubtle Medical alternative
Two vendor-neutral MRI acceleration products, four scanner makers with their own, and the FDA and federal purchase records behind each.
vs Riverain ClearRead CTClearRead CT alternative
Compare the lung CT CAD clearance record, VA orders and support for the whole read.
vs Nanox AI (formerly Zebra Medical Vision)Nanox AI alternative
Compare calcium scoring, bone health, liver fat and the report workflow.
vs AidocAidoc pricing
No list price exists. Here is the public record and the quote checklist.
vs LunitLunit pricing
No list price exists. Here is the public record and the quote checklist.
vs Blackford AI (Blackford Analysis, formerly Bayer Calantic)Blackford AI alternative
Compare ownership, app catalogs, FDA records and contract terms after the Azra AI deal.
From the blog: what the PowerScribe 360 end of life means for radiology groups, how much radiology AI costs, and the full comparison of the best AI radiology software in 2026.
See how Radiological.ai reads alongside your group
One assistant that flags suspected findings, prioritizes the worklist, and drafts the structured report on X-ray, CT and MRI. You review and sign every study.
Decision support for qualified clinicians. Radiological.ai does not provide a diagnosis and is not a substitute for professional medical judgment.