Switching guide · 34 vendors
Radiology AI Alternatives to Aidoc, Nuance PowerScribe, Rad AI and 31 More Vendors Compared
The short answer
Radiology AI vendors fall into four switching decisions, not one. Nuance PowerScribe, Rad AI and DeepHealth sit in reporting, where the PowerScribe 360 support deadline is forcing moves. Aidoc, Viz.ai and RapidAI sell acute triage by pathway. Annalise.ai, Qure.ai, Lunit and Gleamer sell finding detection per exam type. Sirona Medical and New Lantern replace the whole imaging stack. Work out which of those four you are in before you take a demo, because the shortlists barely overlap.
Every comparison on this page exists because a US radiology group asked us the same question in an evaluation. Each one is written to be useful whether or not you end up choosing us, including the parts where the other vendor is the better fit.
Worklist
Structured report
DraftRun the assistant to draft this report for review.
Decision support. The radiologist reviews and signs every study.
Decision support for qualified clinicians. Radiological.ai does not provide a diagnosis and is not a substitute for professional judgment.
Flag · prioritize · draft · you review and sign
The question is rarely "who is better". It is "what am I actually replacing, and what quietly renews anyway".
Start from what you are replacing
Four switching decisions, and the comparison for each
Pick the row you are in. Each card is a full comparison page with a neutral table, the honest case for the other vendor, and the questions that decide the deal.
Reporting and dictation
You are replacing the system your reports are written in
This is the biggest switching decision in US radiology right now, because PowerScribe 360 annual renewals and maintenance ended on August 31, 2026 and full support ends August 31, 2027. Start by working out which product you are actually replacing: Nuance, Microsoft, PowerScribe and Dragon are four different things sold under overlapping names.
Nuance PowerScribe alternative
More than dictation: flagging, triage and drafting.
Read the comparison PowerScribe OnePowerScribe One vs PowerScribe 360
What actually changes in the cloud move, and the third option.
Read the comparison Fluency for ImagingPowerScribe vs Fluency for Imaging
The two reporting platforms most US groups actually shortlist.
Read the comparison PowerScribePowerScribe 360 price and PowerScribe One pricing
No list price exists. Here are the only verifiable numbers that do.
Read the comparison Dragon Medical OneDragon Medical One pricing, cost and alternatives
Microsoft publishes no price. Here are 25 real federal contracts that do.
Read the comparison PowerScribePowerScribe 360 templates and AutoText
What AutoText actually is, how to get yours out, and what survives a migration.
Read the comparison Nuance DAXNuance DAX alternative
Built for the read, not for the patient conversation.
Read the comparison Rad AIRad AI alternative
Drafting plus flagging and triage, in one assistant.
Read the comparison RADPAIR and PowerScribeRadPair vs PowerScribe vs Rad AI
Three ways to write the report, compared on what each one actually replaces.
Read the comparison DeepHealthDeepHealth alternative
Reporting AI without buying it from a competitor.
Read the comparisonAcute triage platforms
You already bought triage and want more of the read covered
Triage platforms reorder the worklist so suspected time-critical studies surface first, and the good ones are genuinely good at it. Groups start shopping when they realize the contract covers a handful of pathways on CT and the other ninety percent of the reading list is untouched.
Aidoc alternative
One assistant across the whole read, not acute triage alone.
Read the comparison Viz.aiViz.ai alternative
Beyond acute stroke triage, across the whole read.
Read the comparison RapidAIRapidAI alternative
Past the stroke pathway, across the whole reading list.
Read the comparison Avicenna.AI CINAAvicenna.AI CINA and the FDA-cleared CT triage vendors compared
CT triage for stroke, pulmonary embolism and spine fractures, usually bought inside a scanner or platform vendor's bundle.
Read the comparison Aidoc and Viz.aiAidoc vs Viz.ai vs RapidAI
Three acute triage platforms, compared on what they were each built to do.
Read the comparisonPer-exam finding detection
You are buying detection one exam type at a time
Detection vendors sell finding flags per modality or per body part. The economics work until you own four of them, at which point you are running four integrations, four validation exercises and four renewal conversations for one reading list.
Annalise.ai alternative
Finding flags plus triage and drafting, together.
Read the comparison Qure.aiQure.ai alternative
Flags plus triage and drafting, in one assistant.
Read the comparison LunitLunit alternative
One assistant across the whole read, not detection on two modalities.
Read the comparison iCADiCAD ProFound AI and the mammography AI vendors compared
The first FDA-cleared AI for breast tomosynthesis, now owned by RadNet, the largest operator of US outpatient imaging centers.
Read the comparison ScreenPoint TransparaScreenPoint Transpara and the mammography AI vendors compared
Dutch mammography AI sold in the US through Siemens Healthineers and Fujifilm units, with the strongest trial record in the category.
Read the comparison Cortechs.ai NeuroQuantCortechs.ai NeuroQuant and the brain MRI volumetrics vendors compared
The longest-cleared brain volumetrics product in the US, bought by imaging centers, neurology groups, the VA and military hospitals.
Read the comparison Subtle MedicalSubtle Medical, AIRS Medical SwiftMR and the scanner makers' deep learning MRI reconstruction compared
Two vendor-neutral MRI acceleration products, four scanner makers with their own, and the FDA and federal purchase records behind each.
Read the comparison GleamerGleamer alternative
One assistant across X-ray, CT and MRI, not a suite of per-exam detectors.
Read the comparisonWhole-stack replacement
You are being asked to replace PACS, viewer and reporter together
A unified radiology operating system is a real strategy and an enormous project. It is worth separating from the question of whether you want AI support in the read, because the two get bundled into one decision far more often than they need to be.
Sirona Medical alternative
Add the assistant to the PACS you already run, without replacing the stack.
Read the comparison New LanternNew Lantern AI alternative
AI drafting and triage on the PACS you keep, not a new platform.
Read the comparison Sectra PACSSectra PACS, Sectra One and the alternatives compared
The PACS that keeps winning satisfaction surveys, sold as a cloud subscription with no public price.
Read the comparison Visage PACSVisage PACS, Visage 7 and the alternatives compared
The fastest-growing enterprise viewer in US radiology, priced per transaction and disclosed deal by deal.
Read the comparison Intelerad PACSIntelerad PACS, IntelePACS and the alternatives compared
The teleradiology favorite, now a GE HealthCare business, with a renewal conversation that just changed.
Read the comparison Exa PACSKonica Minolta Exa PACS and the alternatives compared
Often sold alongside a Konica X-ray room, with a thin public record you should fill in before you sign.
Read the comparison GE Centricity PACSGE Healthcare Centricity PACS and the alternatives compared
An aging install base, three GE PACS lines under one owner, and a recall record you should read before the renewal.
Read the comparison Agfa PACSAgfa PACS, IMPAX and Enterprise Imaging and the alternatives compared
A Best in KLAS platform, a federal record over $300 million, and an IMPAX install base being moved to the cloud.
Read the comparison McKesson PACSMcKesson PACS, Change Healthcare Radiology Solutions and Stratus Imaging PACS compared
A Horizon Medical Imaging install base now owned by Optum, a $98 million federal record and a cloud PACS sold per study.
Read the comparison Mach7Mach7 Technologies, Mach7 PACS and the eUnity viewer compared
A Vermont-run, ASX-listed enterprise imaging vendor with a new CEO, falling revenue and a seat on the VA teleradiology PACS.
Read the comparison VIDIStarVIDIStar PACS, now Fujifilm Synapse Select, and the cardiovascular information systems compared
A Greenville cardiology PACS bought by Hitachi in 2018, inherited by Fujifilm in 2021 and sold today as Synapse Select.
Read the comparisonOutsourced reading services
You are deciding whether to buy radiologist hours instead of software
Outsourcing and capacity are different problems that arrive as the same complaint. A reading service fills a coverage gap nobody can staff, such as nights, weekends and subspecialty studies you do not read in house. Software makes the hours you already pay for cover more of the daytime list. Most groups end up needing a clear answer on which gap they actually have before they price either one.
Virtual Radiologic (vRad) cost and alternatives
vRad publishes no rate card. 357 federal contract awards do.
Read the comparison ONRADONRAD radiology and teleradiology cost and alternatives
ONRAD publishes no rate card. 80 federal contract awards do.
Read the comparison Real RadiologyReal Radiology LLC teleradiology cost and alternatives
Real Radiology publishes no rate card. 41 Army and VA contract awards do.
Read the comparison Experity TeleradiologyExperity Teleradiology (formerly Teleradiology Specialists) compared
The urgent care reading service that started as one Scottsdale radiologist and now sits inside an EMR company.
Read the comparisonSide by side
Every vendor, and the real reason groups start looking
Described by each vendor's own public positioning. The switching reasons are the ones US groups tell us in evaluations, not knocks on the product.
| Vendor | Category | What it does | Why groups look for an alternative |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nuance PowerScribe | Reporting | The radiology reporting and dictation platform of record for much of US radiology. | PowerScribe 360 renewals and maintenance ended on August 31, 2026, which forces a decision rather than inviting one. |
| PowerScribe One | Reporting | The cloud-hosted, subscription-priced successor to PowerScribe 360. | It converts a perpetual license the group already paid for into a subscription that renews, and shifts uptime responsibility to the vendor. |
| Fluency for Imaging | Reporting | Speech-driven reporting with structured output, CAPD nudges and peer review. Formerly M*Modal, 3M and Solventum; acquired to form Jacobian at the end of 2025. | It holds the top customer-satisfaction spot in its KLAS category and offers on-premises deployment, so it is the usual head to head against PowerScribe One. |
| Nuance DAX | Ambient | Ambient documentation of a spoken clinician and patient encounter. | There is no spoken encounter in a diagnostic read, so DAX solves a problem radiology does not have. This is the most common category mismatch we see. |
| Rad AI | Reporting | Impression generation, report drafting and follow-up recommendation tracking. | It works on the report after the images are read, so detection and worklist order stay someone else's contract. |
| RADPAIR | Reporting | Web-based generative AI reporting with nothing to install, partnered with Intelerad since May 2025. | It replaces the reporting workstation rather than layering on it, and it is the only platform of the three that publishes a trial and pay-as-you-go pricing. |
| DeepHealth | Reporting | Reporting Pro, launched commercially June 10, 2026, pairing speech recognition with AI-generated findings, measurements and impressions. | It is owned by RadNet, which operates US outpatient imaging centers, so an independent group would buy core software from a competitor. |
| Aidoc | Triage | Acute triage across a broad portfolio of clinical modules, mostly on CT. | Modules are licensed per pathway, so covering more of the reading list means buying more modules. |
| Viz.ai | Triage | Care-team coordination for time-critical vascular findings, with mobile alerting to the specialist. | The product is built around the acute pathway rather than around the radiologist reading list. |
| RapidAI | Triage | Acute neurovascular imaging built around CT perfusion, with modules for suspected LVO, hemorrhage and aneurysm. | Depth in stroke is the reason to buy it and the reason groups need something else for everything that is not stroke. |
| Avicenna.AI CINA | Triage | CT triage for suspected stroke, pulmonary embolism, aortic dissection and incidental PE, often bought inside a scanner or platform vendor bundle. | Each CINA module covers one acute pathway on CT, so the routine read and the report stay outside it. |
| Annalise.ai | Detection | Broad finding classifiers on chest X-ray and non-contrast head CT. | Finding breadth is confined to two exam types, so CT abdomen, MRI and ultrasound sit outside it. |
| Qure.ai | Detection | Chest X-ray, head CT and lung nodule pathways with a large screening footprint. | Built for screening volume and public-health programs, which is a different shape from a US private practice reading list. |
| Lunit | Detection | Detection for chest X-ray and mammography, plus an oncology biomarker line. | Two screening modalities covered, and nothing on the rest of the list. |
| iCAD ProFound AI | Detection | Detection and density software for mammography and breast tomosynthesis, FDA-cleared for DBT since 2018. | RadNet bought iCAD in July 2025 and folded it into DeepHealth, so independent breast centers now buy from a company that also runs imaging centers. |
| ScreenPoint Transpara | Detection | Mammography and tomosynthesis detection with an exam-level risk score, FDA-cleared since 2018 and sold in the US with Siemens Healthineers and Fujifilm units. | Bought per site or through a modality vendor, and it covers breast imaging only. |
| Cortechs.ai NeuroQuant | Quantification | Brain MRI volumetrics against an age-matched normative database, with MS lesion and PET modules, FDA-cleared since 2006. | Bought as an annual site license and covers brain quantification only. |
| Subtle Medical (SubtleMR, SubtleHD) | MRI acceleration | Vendor-neutral software that denoises and sharpens images from shortened MRI protocols on any scanner, with 11 FDA clearances across MRI, PET and CT since 2018. | Unpublished pricing, a direct rival in AIRS Medical SwiftMR, and scanner makers selling their own deep learning reconstruction. It speeds the scan, not the read. |
| Gleamer | Detection | Per-exam detection products, strongest on trauma and musculoskeletal X-ray. Acquired by RadNet in March 2026 and folded into DeepHealth. | Bought one exam type at a time, and the acquisition puts roadmap questions on the table. |
| Sirona Medical | Full stack | A unified radiology operating system replacing PACS, viewer, worklist and reporter. | It is a stack replacement, so the cost and risk are of a different order from adding an assistant to the PACS you run. |
| vRad (Virtual Radiologic) | Reading service | The largest outsourced radiology reading service in the US, selling radiologist hours by the study, shift or annual coverage contract. | It fills a coverage gap rather than a capacity one, and it is the only name here that is owned by Radiology Partners, the largest radiology practice in the country. |
| ONRAD | Reading service | An independent national teleradiology provider, based in Phoenix, selling preliminary and final reads and on-site radiology staffing, usually as annual coverage contracts. | Since buying Direct Radiology from Philips in January 2025 it is the largest independent reading service in the US, the national option without a practice-acquisition parent. |
| Real Radiology | Reading service | A radiologist-owned national teleradiology practice based in Omaha, Nebraska, selling preliminary and final reads around the clock to hospitals, imaging centers and military clinics. | It has no private equity or practice-acquisition parent, and its federal record is mostly Army hospitals and VA clinics bought as multi-year coverage. |
| Experity Teleradiology | Reading service | The urgent care overread service formerly called Teleradiology Specialists, now sold by the Experity EMR company alongside its practice management software and the OnePACS cloud PACS. | It is the only reading service here owned by an EMR vendor, so the reads are usually priced and renewed inside a wider software contract. |
| Sectra PACS | PACS | Enterprise PACS from Sweden, read on the IDS7 workstation and the UniView web viewer, now sold mostly as the Sectra One Cloud subscription. | Groups rarely leave it for the PACS itself. They look because radiologists want AI in the read, which can be added alongside Sectra without a migration. |
| Visage 7 | PACS | Cloud enterprise imaging platform from Visage Imaging, a Pro Medicus company, known for a fast server-rendered viewer and priced per transaction. | Buyers weigh its viewer speed against cost, which KLAS calls the main barrier. Groups that like the viewer can add AI to the read without migrating. |
| Intelerad IntelePACS | PACS | PACS from Intelerad of Montreal, read on InteleViewer and InteleConnect, with the InteleShare image exchange built from Ambra and Life Image. A GE HealthCare company since March 2026. | The new owner reopens the renewal conversation. Groups happy with the viewer can add AI to the read without migrating. |
| Konica Minolta Exa PACS | PACS | PACS, RIS and billing on one platform from Konica Minolta Healthcare Americas, built by Viztek and often quoted with Konica digital X-ray hardware. | No published price and a thin public record. Groups happy with the viewer can add AI to the read without migrating. |
| GE HealthCare Centricity PACS | PACS | Legacy GE radiology PACS with PACS-IW and Universal Viewer, now sold next to True PACS and, since March 2026, Intelerad. | KLAS reports a high replacement rate and 31 recall entries are still open. Sites can add AI to the read before deciding on the PACS. |
| Agfa HealthCare PACS | PACS | IMPAX and the newer Enterprise Imaging platform with the XERO viewer, sold on premises or as Enterprise Imaging Cloud on AWS. | IMPAX sites face a migration either way, and two XERO recalls are still open. Sites can add AI to the read before deciding on the PACS. |
| McKesson and Change Healthcare PACS | PACS | McKesson Radiology, now Change Healthcare Radiology Solutions under Optum, plus the cloud Stratus Imaging PACS sold per study. | The VA lists vendor end-of-life dates for the 12.x versions and KLAS reports Optum customers evaluating other options. Sites can add AI to the read before deciding on the PACS. |
| VIDIStar (Fujifilm Synapse Select) | Cardiology PACS and CVIS | A cloud cardiovascular PACS and structured reporting system from Greenville, South Carolina, bought by Hitachi in 2018 and sold by Fujifilm since 2021 as Synapse Select. | Its newest FDA clearance under the VidiStar name is from November 2015, and Fujifilm also sells a second cardiology PACS. Radiology can add AI to the read without touching the echo lab. |
| Mach7 Technologies | VNA and enterprise PACS | A vendor neutral archive, the eUnity diagnostic viewer and an Enterprise PACS built from both, listed on the ASX and run from Vermont. | KLAS VNA scores of 66.1 to 75.7 trail Agfa and Fujifilm, and revenue fell 23% in the first half of FY26. Sites can add AI to the read without touching the archive. |
| New Lantern | Full stack | A cloud workspace replacing the PACS viewer, worklist and dictation, with the Curie AI pre-drafting the report. | It is a PACS replacement by design, so getting its AI drafting means migrating priors and retraining every reader on a new viewer. |
| Radiological.ai | All three | Flags suspected findings, prioritizes the worklist and drafts the structured report in one assistant, on the PACS you already run. | Decision support. The radiologist reviews, edits and signs every study. We make no regulatory-status or accuracy claims on this site. |
Vendor descriptions compiled August 2026 from public product positioning. Confirm current scope, pricing and roadmap with each vendor before deciding.
How to run the evaluation
Four steps that decide whether a switch is worth it
The evaluations that go wrong go wrong early, usually by comparing products that were never solving the same problem.
01
Name the product, not the vendor
Half of the wasted evaluation time in this market comes from comparing things that do not compete. Nuance sells a reporting platform, a general speech engine and an ambient scribe under one brand inside Microsoft. Aidoc sells triage modules. Rad AI works on the impression. Write down the single job you want done differently, then shortlist only the tools that do that job.
02
Count the contracts you are actually replacing
Groups routinely discover mid-evaluation that the quote in front of them replaces one of three tools they run, and the other two renew anyway. Add up every AI line item touching the reading list, including per-module triage licenses, per-exam detection products and reporting AI, before you compare any price.
03
Test on your own case mix, not the demo set
Every vendor demo runs on studies chosen because they demo well. Ask for a shadow period against your own recent volume, on your own scanners and protocols, and read the output the way you would read it on a real shift. A tool that behaves well on a curated set and poorly on your 2 a.m. portable chest films will not survive contact with the schedule.
04
Price the exit before you price the entry
Ask what happens to your report templates, your configuration and your historical outputs when the contract ends, and get the answer in writing. In reporting platforms specifically, the template library is the asset nobody else has a copy of. Export it while your current contract is live and your administrator still has access.
Two of those steps have their own pages, because they are where most of the money moves. On cost, PowerScribe 360 price and PowerScribe One pricing analyzes 183 public federal contract awards and shows how often upgrade services, interface work and training are contracted separately from the license itself. On the exit question, the PowerScribe 360 templates and AutoText guide covers exporting your library to XML and the attached settings, such as procedure code mappings and patient class filters, that do not travel with the template text.
If you are earlier than that and still mapping the market, the best AI radiology software buyer's guide groups the tools by problem rather than ranking them, and the questions to ask a radiology AI vendor is the list we would want a group to bring to us.
If the platform you are replacing is the one you dictate into rather than a detection tool, the shortlist is a different one. Our radiology reporting software comparison covers PowerScribe One, Fluency for Imaging, RADPAIR, Rad AI, Sirona Medical and DeepHealth in one table, sorted by whether each replaces your platform of record or layers on top of it.
Where we fit
One assistant instead of three contracts
The pattern behind almost every comparison on this page: groups end up owning a triage tool, a detection tool and a reporting tool, wired into the same PACS, renewing on three different dates.
Flag suspected findings
A consistent second set of flags marks regions worth a closer look, on X-ray, CT and MRI rather than on the two exam types a per-exam detector covers. Every flag is a prompt for review, and you confirm or dismiss it.
Prioritize the worklist
Studies that look time-critical move toward the top of the queue, across the whole reading list rather than the pathways a module covers. You still choose what to read next.
Draft the structured report
The report drafts into your own template across Exam, Technique, Comparison, Findings and Impression, so you start from a draft rather than a blank page. You edit, dictate over it and sign.
None of that requires changing your PACS. Radiological.ai connects over standard DICOM to the archive you already run, which is the difference between a project measured in quarters and one measured in years. See how the PACS integration works, or read the detail on structured radiology reporting and worklist prioritization.
It is decision support and nothing more than that. The assistant surfaces and drafts; the responsible radiologist reviews, edits and signs every study. We publish no accuracy figures and claim no regulatory status on this site, and you should ask every vendor on this page for theirs in writing.
Questions buyers actually ask
Frequently asked questions about radiology AI alternatives
What are the alternatives to Aidoc?
The closest direct alternatives are other acute triage platforms: Viz.ai, which is built around care-team coordination and mobile alerting, and RapidAI, which is deepest in neurovascular imaging and CT perfusion. If the reason you are looking is that module licensing only covers a few pathways, the alternative to consider is a single assistant that works across the whole reading list rather than another per-pathway platform.
Who are Aidoc's competitors?
In acute triage, Viz.ai and RapidAI are the usual head to head comparisons. In finding detection, Annalise.ai, Qure.ai, Lunit and Gleamer overlap on specific exam types. Aidoc positions itself as an enterprise AI platform rather than a point tool, so the real competitive set depends on whether you are buying a platform or solving one pathway.
What is an alternative to Nuance PowerScribe?
It depends which PowerScribe problem you have. If you need a supported reporting platform, the vendor path is PowerScribe One and the market alternatives are other speech-based reporting systems. If your actual bottleneck is dictation time rather than the platform, reporting AI such as Rad AI addresses the impression. If you want the whole read supported rather than the report alone, that is a different category.
Who are Nuance's competitors in radiology?
Nuance is now part of Microsoft, and the radiology-specific product is PowerScribe rather than Dragon or DAX. On reporting, competitors include other speech-driven reporting platforms and the unified radiology operating systems that bundle a reporter, such as Sirona Medical. On the AI layer inside the report, Rad AI is the most direct comparison. Work out which product you mean first.
Is there an alternative to PowerScribe 360?
Yes, and you need one, because annual renewals and maintenance for PowerScribe 360 ended on August 31, 2026 and full support ends August 31, 2027. The vendor path is PowerScribe One, which is cloud-hosted and subscription priced. The two can run side by side during a migration. Staying on PowerScribe 360 indefinitely with support behind it is the one option that is not available.
What are the top AI radiology companies?
The names US groups shortlist most often are Aidoc, Viz.ai and RapidAI in acute triage; Annalise.ai, Qure.ai, Lunit and Gleamer in finding detection; and Rad AI and Nuance PowerScribe on the reporting side. Sirona Medical sits apart because it replaces the imaging stack rather than adding to it. There is no single ranking that holds, because these products solve three different problems.
How do I choose between radiology AI vendors?
Decide the category before the vendor. Triage changes what you read next, detection changes what you look at, and reporting AI changes how the report gets written. Buying a well-reviewed tool for the wrong minute of the workflow is the most common expensive mistake in this market. Once the category is settled, compare on PACS fit, case-mix performance during a shadow period, and total first-year cost including integration.
Does switching radiology AI vendors mean changing our PACS?
It should not. Tools that consume studies over standard DICOM from the archive you already run, and return results your existing viewer can display, do not require a PACS change. The exception is the whole-stack products such as Sirona Medical, which replace PACS, viewer, worklist and reporter by design. Ask this question in the first call, because the answer sets the size of the project.
Can we run two radiology AI tools at the same time?
Yes, and most groups do during an evaluation. Running a candidate in shadow alongside the incumbent is the only honest way to compare them on your own volume. Budget for the overlap period in the contract, and agree in advance what evidence would make you switch, because otherwise the comparison drifts into opinion at renewal time.
How long does it take to switch radiology AI vendors?
The software connection is usually the fast part. What sets the timeline is interface work with your PACS and RIS, a shadow period long enough to see your real case mix, template and configuration migration where a reporting platform is involved, and radiologist training. Plan in quarters rather than weeks, and start reporting-platform migrations well before a support deadline rather than against it.
What should we ask a radiology AI vendor before signing?
Four questions do most of the work. What exactly does this replace, and what still renews? What does the fully loaded first-year total include beyond the license? What happens to our data, templates and configuration when the contract ends? And what does the subscription do at renewal three years out? Ask for the answers in writing.
How much does radiology AI software cost?
Almost nobody in this market publishes list pricing, so any figure quoted publicly is somebody else's negotiated deal rather than a rate card. Pricing is normally per site and driven by reader count, study volume, module scope and integration work. Our pricing page publishes plans, and the PowerScribe pricing analysis works through the only public numbers that exist for that vendor, drawn from federal contract awards.
Put us on the shortlist you are already running
Flag suspected findings, prioritize the worklist and draft the structured report, on the PACS you already run. Test it in shadow against your own case mix, next to whichever vendor you are comparing.
X-ray, CT & MRI · Flag, triage, draft · You review & sign
Radiological.ai is a workflow and decision-support tool for qualified clinicians. It does not provide a diagnosis and is not a substitute for professional medical judgment. Other companies named on this page are identified for comparison only; all trademarks belong to their respective owners.