Platform & software · Nuclear medicine software
Nuclear medicine software compared across PET CT software, nuclear medicine reporting and processing vendors
The short answer
Nuclear medicine software is three separate purchases that share a name. The first is processing and reading software, which reconstructs, fuses and quantifies PET/CT and SPECT/CT studies: MIM Software, now owned by GE HealthCare, and Hermes Medical Solutions are the two vendor-neutral names, alongside the console suites each scanner maker ships. The second is the department information system, usually called an NMIS, which tracks radiopharmaceutical doses from receipt to disposal and produces the records an NRC or agreement-state inspector asks for. The third is reporting, where the physician turns SUV measurements and comparison reads into a signed report. Checked against openFDA on September 17, 2026, MIM holds 22 FDA 510(k) clearances and Hermes holds 17, while the NMIS products hold none because they manage records rather than images. Federal contract awards put a MIM or Hermes system between about $50,000 and $750,000 depending on scope, and an NMIS site license at a median of $17,580.
Nuclear medicine departments buy software in a market that is small enough to have almost no independent comparison in it. Search the category and the first page is the vendors themselves, a market research abstract and a product directory. That is fine for finding names and useless for choosing between them, because the names do different jobs.
A processing suite is the workstation the physician reads on. It takes the raw PET, SPECT and CT series off the camera, reconstructs and registers them, fuses the functional image onto the anatomy and produces the numbers that end up in the report: SUVmax and SUVpeak, lesion volumes, Deauville and PERCIST assessments, cardiac perfusion scores, dosimetry for radionuclide therapy. That is regulated software. It changes what the physician sees and measures, so it clears through the FDA 510(k) process under the image processing regulation at 21 CFR 892.2050 or the emission tomography regulation at 892.1200.
A nuclear medicine information system is a different thing entirely. It records which unit dose arrived from which radiopharmacy, its assayed activity and time, which patient received it and when, what was left over, and how the residual was decayed and disposed of. It holds the wipe test results, the dose calibrator constancy checks, the receiving surveys and the sealed source inventory. When an inspector visits, the NMIS is what gets opened. None of this touches an image, so none of it needs a clearance.
Reporting sits on top of both and is where the department's time actually goes. A whole-body PET/CT report in an oncology practice runs to several hundred words, carries a table of measurements against a prior study, and has to reconcile the nuclear medicine physician's read of the functional data with the diagnostic CT read that often comes from a different radiologist. Most groups still dictate that from scratch.
This page separates the three layers, puts the verifiable facts about each vendor side by side, and is honest about where Radiological.ai fits. It is not a nuclear medicine processing system and does not reconstruct, fuse or quantify PET or SPECT data. It reads X-ray, CT and MRI, and where it touches this category is the CT component of a PET/CT and the structured report the department signs.
Worklist
Structured report
DraftRun the assistant to draft this report for review.
Decision support. The radiologist reviews and signs every study.
Decision support for qualified clinicians. Radiological.ai does not provide a diagnosis and is not a substitute for professional judgment.
Flag · prioritize · draft · you review and sign
Decision support not a diagnosis
You review & sign
Processing software hands its images and measurements to the archive over the same interfaces as every other modality, so the integration questions are the ones in radiology PACS integration, DICOM and HL7, and which archive holds them is worked through in PACS software and PACS system vendors compared by study volume and enterprise imaging and vendor neutral archive software. Orders, scheduling and the exam record live in the radiology information system, which the NMIS usually talks to over an HL7 interface.
The report is where the measurements end up, so the template design questions in structured radiology reporting apply directly to PET/CT, and the radiology reporting software comparison covers the dictation and drafting products the department will read into. CT dose recorded on the CT half of a hybrid study follows the same rules as any other CT, covered in radiation dose monitoring software. For what the surrounding software costs against federal contract data, see radiology software pricing, and for the department-system layer specifically, the nuclear medicine information system buyer's guide compares NMIS, IBC and Optility on cost and compliance records.
Side by side
Five nuclear medicine software products, compared on what can be verified
The first three columns are processing and reading software. The fourth is the scanner maker's own suite. The fifth is a department information system, which is a different layer and is here because buyers keep comparing it to the others.
| What you are comparing | MIM Software (GE HealthCare) | Hermes Medical Solutions | Segami Oasis | OEM console suites | ec2 NMIS and BioDose (Mirion) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Which layer it is | Vendor-neutral processing, quantification and dosimetry across PET, SPECT and CT | Vendor-neutral processing, reading and dosimetry, plus a nuclear medicine PACS | Vendor-neutral processing and viewing | Processing and reading tied to the maker's scanners, for example Siemens syngo.via and GE Xeleris | Department information system: dose tracking, hot lab records, compliance reports. Not an image tool |
| FDA 510(k) clearances held by the applicant | 22, from Mobile MIM in February 2011 to Contour ProtégéAI+ in March 2026 | 17, from the Hermes Medical Imaging Suite in December 2012 to Affinity in July 2026 | 6, from Mirage in October 1997 to Oasis Release 1.0 in August 2007 | Cleared with, or as accessories to, the scanner | None, and none required. It manages records rather than images |
| Most recent nuclear medicine clearance | MIM LesionID Pro, K251883, December 11, 2025, code LLZ | Affinity, K253835, July 31, 2026, code QIH; Hybrid Viewer, K252477, September 9, 2025, code KPS | Oasis Release 1.0, K071584, August 31, 2007. Nothing since | Varies by scanner generation | Not applicable |
| Who owns it | GE HealthCare, which acquired MIM Software on April 1, 2024 for about $258 million net of cash plus up to $35 million in milestones | Independent, headquartered in Stockholm, with a United States subsidiary that holds the federal contracts | Independent, Columbia, Maryland | Siemens Healthineers, GE HealthCare, Philips | Mirion Technologies, which acquired ec2 Software Solutions and NUMA on November 1, 2023 for $33 million in cash |
| Federal prime contract awards found | 236 awards, 2008 to 2026, $15,473,497 in total | 73 awards, 2007 to 2026, $7,433,790 in total | 1 award, $33,375, June 2010 | Bundled into scanner purchases; not separable | 67 software and support awards, 2007 to 2026, $1,641,247 in total |
| Median federal award | $34,837 | $64,543 | No basis | No basis | $17,580 |
| Largest federal award seen | $1,334,090, VA, "Nuclear Med Integrated Platform", September 2023 | $749,500, Army, nuclear medicine hardware and software, May 2017 | $33,375 | Not separable | $169,479, VISN 10 BioDose, September 2023; $162,597 BioDose Enterprise upgrade, May 2026 |
| Who buys it in the public record | VA medical centers overwhelmingly, plus the Defense Health Agency, the Navy and NIH; most awards are radiation oncology contouring, 25 name nuclear medicine, Encore, PET, SPECT or Y90 | Army, Defense Health Agency and VA; 37 of the 73 awards started in 2025 or 2026 | One Defense Logistics Agency capital equipment purchase | Every scanner buyer, by default | VA sites almost entirely, bought direct from Mirion (Capintec) in 31 awards and through Mystic Ventures Group, Pinestar Technology and Pulcir in the rest |
| The honest case against it | You now buy vendor-neutral software from a scanner vendor, and the acquisition is recent enough that the roadmap is still being set | Smaller company than the OEMs, and the federal surge is recent, so ask for reference sites of your own size | No new clearance in nineteen years is a question to put to the vendor before anything else | Ties your reading workstation to your camera contract, which is the point of buying vendor-neutral | Solves the hot lab and the inspection, and nothing about reading or reporting; do not compare it to the first four columns |
FDA counts are 510(k) records returned by the openFDA device endpoint for each applicant name on September 17, 2026. Federal award figures are prime contract awards from USAspending.gov retrieved the same day, with every recipient name and award description read individually before it was counted; MIM and Hermes figures are for the recipient as a whole and include radiation oncology and maintenance awards, and the NMIS figures exclude label paper, parts and any award under $1,000. A zero means no record matched, not that the product is unavailable. Ownership and product scope change; confirm current products and pricing with the vendor before shortlisting.
Why it works
What your group gets with nuclear medicine software
The FDA record separates the reading vendors, and it says nothing about the NMIS
Searched by applicant on September 17, 2026, openFDA returns 22 clearances for MIM Software, 17 for Hermes Medical Solutions, 6 for Segami, 4 for EXINI Diagnostics, whose aPROMISE PET analysis is now part of Lantheus, and 10 for Mirada Medical. The dates are the useful part. MIM cleared LesionID Pro in December 2025 and two dosimetry products in 2024. Hermes cleared Affinity in July 2026 and Hybrid Viewer in September 2025. Segami's most recent clearance is Oasis Release 1.0 from August 2007. A vendor can update cleared software without a new submission, so an old date is not proof of an old product, but it is the first question to ask. The department information systems have no clearances at all, and a procurement scorecard that docks them for it has misunderstood what they are.
Real prices run from a $17,580 NMIS license to a $1.3 million integrated platform
Federal awards are the only public price record in this category. For the department system, 67 software and support awards for NMIS and BioDose between 2007 and 2026 total $1,641,247 with a median of $17,580, and 45 of the 67 fall between $10,000 and $50,000; the two outliers are a $169,479 VISN 10 BioDose award in September 2023 and a $162,597 BioDose Enterprise upgrade in May 2026. Since 2023 the median has risen to $24,518 across 18 awards. For reading software, Hermes' 73 awards have a median of $64,543 and top out at $749,500, and MIM's 236 awards have a median of $34,837 and top out at $1,334,090 for a VA nuclear medicine integrated platform in September 2023. A single Hermes nuclear medicine PACS award in June 2022 was $499,995, and a two-site MIM post-processing subscription in July 2023 was $624,763. Read these as scale for specific scopes, not list prices, and note that many are annual maintenance rather than new purchases.
The report is the layer nobody sells you, and it is where the hours go
Processing software produces the numbers. The NMIS produces the compliance record. Neither produces the report, and a whole-body PET/CT report with a measurement table against the prior study is among the longest documents a radiology department signs. Radiological.ai is not nuclear medicine processing software and does not reconstruct, fuse or quantify PET or SPECT data. It supports X-ray, CT and MRI. Where it fits a hybrid imaging department is the CT half of the PET/CT, which it reads for suspected findings and prioritizes on the worklist like any other CT, and the structured report, which it drafts into the department's own template so the SUV table, the comparison fields and the impression land in the same place on every study. The physician enters the functional read, reviews everything, edits and signs.
What it handles
Flagged, prioritized and drafted for your review
The assistant pre-reads each study, surfaces a region of interest for review, re-prioritizes the worklist, and drafts the structured report in your template. You confirm, edit and sign.
- Flags suspected findings on the CT component of a PET/CT for a second look before the report is signed
- Prioritizes the worklist so urgent hybrid studies are read first
- Drafts the structured report into your own PET/CT and SPECT templates, with the measurement table and comparison fields in fixed positions
- Keeps report structure consistent across nuclear medicine physicians and radiologists who share a study
- Works alongside MIM, Hermes or your OEM suite and your NMIS rather than replacing any of them
- Physician reviews, edits and signs every study
Region of interest flagged for review
A focal region is surfaced on the sample study for the radiologist to review. The assistant does not characterize it as a diagnosis.
Suspected finding flagged for radiologist review. Correlate clinically and confirm. Draft for review and sign-off.
Why Radiological.ai
One assistant across the whole read
Not three vendors stitched together. Flag, prioritize and draft in one calm pane, on X-ray, CT and MRI, with the radiologist signing every study.
Flags suspected findings
A second set of eyes surfaces regions of interest for review on every study, so a suspected finding is less likely to slip past late in a shift.
Prioritizes the worklist
Suspected-critical studies move to the top, so urgent reads surface ahead of routine follow-ups across your sites and shifts.
Drafts the report
A structured draft arrives in your template, ready to edit and sign. The draft saves the typing and the measuring, never the judgment.
Good questions
Questions about nuclear medicine software
Explore more
More ways teams read with Radiological.ai
Radiology AI platform
One assistant across the whole read, not three point tools stitched together.
Learn moreAI medical imaging
A workflow assistant for the imaging your team reads every day.
Learn moreAI radiology assistant
An assistant that reads alongside you and drafts before you sit down.
Learn moreFrom the blog: best AI radiology software in 2026, how much radiology AI costs, how to implement AI in a radiology workflow, and AI radiology companies.
Read more studies, with the assistant alongside you
Flag suspected findings, prioritize the worklist, and draft the structured report. You review and sign every study.
Radiological.ai is a workflow and decision-support tool for qualified clinicians. It does not provide a diagnosis and is not a substitute for professional medical judgment.